<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx</link><description>WSUS Admins, Happy New Year!! I wanted to provide some guidance on the prerequisite update (KB935509) for Windows Vista Service Pack 1 because it’s a little different than the typical content we release. You may have read about on the Windows Vista team</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Geek Lectures - Things geeks should know about &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo;  A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2721834</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:44:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2721834</guid><dc:creator>Geek Lectures - Things geeks should know about » Blog Archive   »  A Note regarding KB935509</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://geeklectures.info/2008/01/07/a-note-regarding-kb935509/"&gt;http://geeklectures.info/2008/01/07/a-note-regarding-kb935509/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Note regarding KB935509...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2723975</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:43:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2723975</guid><dc:creator>Microsoft Update Product Team Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all, Just dropping a quick line to let you know about one of the updates we're releasing this week&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2724516</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:09:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2724516</guid><dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds downright maddening. &amp;nbsp;SP1 has two prerequisite patches that in turn have a prerequisite? &amp;nbsp;That is enough to make one's head hurt!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2724630</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:34:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2724630</guid><dc:creator>Dr. Leonard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Say, hello to everyone; how do I get ahold of WSUS for my SOHO network? I am running multi-boot workstations behind a Solaris 10 server in a hybrid client/server config.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Wishes to All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dr. Leonard&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2724719</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:00:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2724719</guid><dc:creator>BillD</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Update installed this KB935509 on my Home Premium, right now. Why? Is it not for Ultimate and Business only?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2726437</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:21:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2726437</guid><dc:creator>The Dave</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dr. Leonard, you get WSUS the same way everybody else does, &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.google.ca/search?q=wsus"&gt;http://www.google.ca/search?q=wsus&lt;/a&gt; which leads you to &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/wsus/bb466193.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/wsus/bb466193.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that a Windows 2003 (or 2008 beta) server is required.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2726713</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:06:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2726713</guid><dc:creator>knoxville</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Updates fails to install, have tried it several times by now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As of this morning my PC would not start (w Vista 32b Ultimate). At a certain stage (prior welcome message) it reboots. Sometimes it does not, but monitor would get no signal. Event log shows that Windows is not able to set Bitlocker status to default, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What can I do?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2727127</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:21:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2727127</guid><dc:creator>L H </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm having the same issue with this update not installing on my x86 Ultimate box. It gets as far as the &amp;quot;Configuring updates&amp;quot; screen, then reboots, then does &amp;quot;Configuring updates&amp;quot; again, then I lot in and find it failed installation. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2728314</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2728314</guid><dc:creator>.htaccess</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Same problem here...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vista Ultimate, dual boot system with Kubuntu&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2733276</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:06:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2733276</guid><dc:creator>Piotr Nowakowski</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Same exact problem. Vista dual boot with Kubuntu.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2733321</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2733321</guid><dc:creator>James G Robertson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Update KB935509 failed to install, twice, on 2 machines. &amp;nbsp;Both run Ultimate 64 on Core 2 Duo. &amp;nbsp;One is a desktop w/o TPM chip, and the other is a Thinkpad with a TPM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see this was a problem with the RC1 as others have posted comments about it. &amp;nbsp;I did not install the RC1 and will wait for SP1 but if this is a prerequisite, then this install issue must be fixed by MS. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I use virtual machines (Vista's) on both machines and have a large compliment of applications, MS, Adobe, Nero, Logitech etc on both. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I run dual displays on both machines and both have the FireGL V5200.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Help please.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Prepare Yourself for Vista SP1.  Install its Necessary Prerequisites.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2736637</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:58:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2736637</guid><dc:creator>Realtime Community | Windows Server</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the three prerequisites for the Vista SP1 upgrade is available now. According to the Vista team blog, KB935509, the first of these, &amp;quot;modifies the boot loader to enable successful install or uninstall of the service pack if the PC uses BitLocker&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2763245</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:25:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2763245</guid><dc:creator>R. Palladino</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have Vista 32 Ultimate on ThinkPad T61 which dual boots Linux Fedora 8. &amp;nbsp;All previous Windows updated installed OK, but starting with KB935509 no Windows Updates are installing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows update says that it is downloading the updates and I get a message that they have been installed. &amp;nbsp;However on reboot, a review of the update history shows the updates failed. &amp;nbsp;Subsequent Windows Updates show the 7 failed updates available. &amp;nbsp;The first attempt at installing Windows Vista update &amp;nbsp;KB935509 encountered error code: &amp;nbsp;80010108 subsequent attempts at installing &amp;nbsp;KB935509 encountered error code: &amp;nbsp;80004005 &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any recommendations or suggestions would be appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could this be an incompatibility between &amp;quot;Windows&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Linux&amp;quot; in a dual booted environment? &amp;nbsp; If so, Windows will be dropped by me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2780268</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:15:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2780268</guid><dc:creator>MBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have the have problem. My desktop has dual boot also. I will activated the partition with windows Vista. So it will boot windows vista direct. It may work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2814244</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:15:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2814244</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this some &amp;quot;sneaky&amp;quot; way to force people to uninstall their choice of bootloaders and other operating systems. &amp;nbsp;Sounds like the antitrust investigation needs to be started up again!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#2949070</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:49:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2949070</guid><dc:creator>A Michael</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;KB935509 constantly fails for me too. I also have a dual-boot system of windows and Ubuntu. What's going on??&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3023448</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:08:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3023448</guid><dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;those who receive them really richer, does not make them really &amp;lt;a href= &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://idisk.mac.com/dukebluedevilsfreewe/Public/0/animated-christian-myspace-layouts.html"&gt;http://idisk.mac.com/dukebluedevilsfreewe/Public/0/animated-christian-myspace-layouts.html&lt;/a&gt; &amp;gt;animated christian myspace layouts&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;value &amp;nbsp; you do not increase the real wealth, the real revenue, pkkqjxvgcf&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3053878</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:00:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3053878</guid><dc:creator>Viktar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to install this update for two weeks. Still didn't find solution how to do this. I have just one system Windows Ultimate x32, but update failed to install.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3054075</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:44:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3054075</guid><dc:creator>Habib</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;same here... using windows Vista Ultimate x32 and dual boot with XP. Both OS are installed on two partitions but within same HD&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3054523</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:28:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3054523</guid><dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;KB935509 Updates fails to install also on my machine. Thinkpad T60p with a Linux and a Windows Vista partition. The only machine (out of 134 workstations) with Windows Vista - I know why we don't migrate to that operating system.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3074400</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:02:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3074400</guid><dc:creator>games</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;very gooooooooooood&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;very very nic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thank you &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3084374</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:58:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3084374</guid><dc:creator>Neked</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Update and Microsoft Update from the following site: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/wsus/default.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/wsus/default.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3103874</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:15:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3103874</guid><dc:creator>Peter Szabo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm having the same issue with this update not installing on my x86 Ultimate box. It gets as far as the &amp;quot;Configuring updates&amp;quot; screen, then reboots, then does &amp;quot;Configuring updates&amp;quot; again, then I lot in and find it failed installation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3105833</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:34:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3105833</guid><dc:creator>Christian Solei</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have the have problem. My desktop has dual boot also. I will activated the partition with windows Vista. So it will boot windows vista direct. It may work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3151556</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:48:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3151556</guid><dc:creator>gelinlikler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;However on reboot, a review of the update history shows the updates failed thanks you very nice&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3151557</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:49:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3151557</guid><dc:creator>gelinlikler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My desktops has dual boots also. I will activateds the partitions with windows Vista very nice&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3151558</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3151558</guid><dc:creator>havuz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Subsequents Windows Update show the 7 failed update availables thank &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3151559</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:51:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3151559</guid><dc:creator>Havuz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I runs dual displays on boths machine and both have the thanks you&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3151561</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:52:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3151561</guid><dc:creator>ilahi dinle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The only machines (out of 134 workstations) withs Windows Vista - I knows why we don't migrates to that operating system wonderful&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3165075</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:13:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3165075</guid><dc:creator>BAttERY</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/toshiba/pa3465u.php"&gt;http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/toshiba/pa3465u.php&lt;/a&gt; Genuine TOSHIBA PA3465U-1BRS Laptop Battery PABAS069 laptop battery, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/gateway/6500358.php"&gt;http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/gateway/6500358.php&lt;/a&gt; battery for solo 9300 6500358 GT-6300L laptop battery, &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3166938</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:07:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3166938</guid><dc:creator>865</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.battery-export.com/ibm/lenovo-ibm-thinkpad-r500.html"&gt;http://www.battery-export.com/ibm/lenovo-ibm-thinkpad-r500.html&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;LENOVO IBM ThinkPad R500&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.battery-export.com/ibm/lenovo-ibm-thinkpad-t500.html"&gt;http://www.battery-export.com/ibm/lenovo-ibm-thinkpad-t500.html&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;LENOVO IBM ThinkPad T500&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.battery-export.com/ibm/lenovo-ibm-thinkpad-w500.html"&gt;http://www.battery-export.com/ibm/lenovo-ibm-thinkpad-w500.html&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;LENOVO IBM ThinkPad W500&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3175327</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:33:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3175327</guid><dc:creator>sohbet odaları</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;thnaks &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.trstar.net&amp;quot;"&gt;http://www.trstar.net&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; title=&amp;quot;chat sohbet, sohbet odalari&amp;quot;&amp;gt;sohbet chat&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; very good &amp;nbsp;no spam&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3177725</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:58:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3177725</guid><dc:creator>Sohbet</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;unstable. &amp;nbsp;I would not want to be the helicopter pilot with you as my sys admin ;^). &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank's and happy &amp;nbsp;good job&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.ircask.com"&gt;http://www.ircask.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3202610</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:28:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3202610</guid><dc:creator>karot</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm having the same issue with this update not installing on my x86 Ultimate box. It gets as far as the &amp;quot;Configuring updates&amp;quot; screen, then reboots, then does &amp;quot;Configuring updates&amp;quot; again, then I lot in and find it failed installation. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3202611</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:28:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3202611</guid><dc:creator>kartvizit </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I runs dual displays on boths machine and both have the thanks you&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3251107</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:38:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3251107</guid><dc:creator>sohbet</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hi. thanks.. very good informations.. &amp;nbsp;nice nice sites.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3251109</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:47:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3251109</guid><dc:creator>chat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I runs dual displays on boths machine and both have the thanks you&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3265183</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3265183</guid><dc:creator>Sohbet</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Subsequents Windows Update show the 7 failed update availables thank &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3267460</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:44:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3267460</guid><dc:creator>medyum</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the three prerequisites for the Vista SP1 upgrade is available now. According to the Vista team blog, KB935509, the first of these, &amp;quot;modifies the boot loader to enable successful install or uninstall of the service pack if the PC uses BitLocker&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3269768</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:03:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3269768</guid><dc:creator>Rap</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ggg hhhhhhhhhhh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kodes.com"&gt;http://www.kodes.com&lt;/a&gt; Hiphop, Rap, Ceza, sagopa, Kolera&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.gekkog.com"&gt;http://www.gekkog.com&lt;/a&gt; Hiphop, Rap, Gekko G&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.maskanimasyon.com"&gt;http://www.maskanimasyon.com&lt;/a&gt; Animasyon&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3272062</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:11:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3272062</guid><dc:creator>web tasarım</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.parcakontorbayiniz.com"&gt;http://www.parcakontorbayiniz.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A Note regarding KB935509</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wsus/archive/2008/01/08/a-note-regarding-kb935509.aspx#3295645</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:38:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3295645</guid><dc:creator>sevgililer günü hediyesi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;same here... using windows Vista Ultimate x32 and dual boot with XP. Both OS are installed on two partitions but within same HD&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>