<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hyper-V and VHD Performance - Dynamic vs. Fixed</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx</link><description>My name is Tim Litton, I work as a Program Manager within the Microsoft Windows Server team, and my particular area of focus is performance optimization for Hyper-V. With the recent release of Hyper-V, customers are starting to ask us how to configure</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Hyper-V: Dynamic versus Fixed VHD Performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3126243</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:38:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3126243</guid><dc:creator>Windows Virtualization Team Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim Litton posted a blog about performance optimization for Hyper-V, looking at fixed versus dynamic VHDs. Here's an excerpt: The following graph shows the relative performances for a number of different scenarios (with Dynamic VHD being the baseline).&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Fixed disk versus Dynamic disk</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3127114</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:19:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3127114</guid><dc:creator>Jaap's blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;zowel bij de Hyper-V dag als bij de DMCUG dag waren er performance vragen over fixed disk versus dynamic&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Hyper-V and VHD performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3128899</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:14:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3128899</guid><dc:creator>Vinod Kumar - ExtremeExperts.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Catch the blog by the performance team around using Hyper-V and VHD files. Read it here .&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V and VHD Performance - Dynamic vs. Fixed</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3140386</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:05:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3140386</guid><dc:creator>John Keating</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Would you see the same peformance degradation if you pre-grew the VHD (let's say a 36 GB partition) with a &amp;nbsp;filler file (let's say 10 GB) and then deleted it. That way, you would get around the possible file fragmenetation (which is probably causing the performance issue with the dynamic disks)? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff face=Calibri&gt;With Dynamic Disks there is an extra translation done&amp;nbsp;to map the logical disk location within the Dynamic VHD&amp;nbsp;to the physical&amp;nbsp;backing file location so Fixed Disks will always be faster than Dynamic Disks.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff face=Calibri&gt;Details on the VHD format can be found here: &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/virtualserver/downloads/vhdspec.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/virtualserver/downloads/vhdspec.mspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff face=Calibri&gt;When writing to a new location on a Dynamic VHD, it may be necessary to grow the physical backing file, which means more &lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:10pt;mso-bidi-font-family:'Times New Roman';mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;mso-themecolor:dark2;"&gt;physical &lt;/SPAN&gt;I/Os are required to satisfy the request.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff face=Calibri&gt;Tim Litton, Program Manager, Windows Server Performance.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hyper-V and VHD Performance - Dynamic vs. Fixed</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3151975</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:28:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3151975</guid><dc:creator>Amit Pawar - Infrastructure blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are in the midst of testing and deploying Virtual machines using the VHD file format on Hyper-V&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>PFE Hyper-V Ops Day – October</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3158912</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:49:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3158912</guid><dc:creator>The World Simplified is a Virtual World</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We ran a Hyper-V day at the end of October, and collated a series of useful links and best practice guidance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Hyper-V: Dynamic versus Fixed VHD Performance </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3182239</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:32:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3182239</guid><dc:creator>ITConfig Blog By Oshri Avitan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim Litton posted in his blog about performance optimization for Hyper-V, looking at fixed versus dynamic&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New virtualboy.tv video: Hyper-V and Pass-Through Disks</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3207458</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:11:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3207458</guid><dc:creator>virtualboy.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Video #9 in the Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V series, is this video focussed on the use of Pass Through&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Virtualizing SharePoint Series - Recommendations for optimizing the performance of a virtualized SharePoint environment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3209676</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:14:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3209676</guid><dc:creator>UK SharePoint Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Audience : SharePoint Solution Architect, SharePoint Infrastructure Architect, Consultant, IT Administrator&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Hyper-V best practise with SharePoint</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/winserverperformance/archive/2008/09/19/hyper-v-and-vhd-performance-dynamic-vs-fixed.aspx#3237680</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:40:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3237680</guid><dc:creator>TechNet Team Blog Austria</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Virtualisierung sind super, sei es f&amp;#252;r Legacy-Systeme, Testbetrieb oder Konsolidierung von Hardware.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>