<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Where we're headed with virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx</link><description>Hi, Mike Neil here. It’s been a while since I've posted. To update you, I now oversee the development teams, plans and strategy for our virtualization software - both the desktop and server. In this role, I’m really fortunate in that I get to meet with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Where Microsoft is heading with Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#662289</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:37:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:662289</guid><dc:creator>VolkerW's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike Neil just posted a very good summary of our Virtualization strategy. Mike Neil is General Manager&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Virtualization who's who in the zoo - Microsoft Product Suite</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#662315</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:05:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:662315</guid><dc:creator>Dugie's Pensieve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I know the title is a bit weird, but it sounds better tan the boring &amp;quot;Microsoft Virtualization Roadmap&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Read this post on virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#662615</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:46:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:662615</guid><dc:creator>Off Campus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm loving this article from Mike Neil in the Windows Server group. Especially the quote below. I can't&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Nice post about the way Microsoft is heading with virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#662953</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:28:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:662953</guid><dc:creator>Eric Denekamp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.asp"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Where we're headed with Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#663310</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:11:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:663310</guid><dc:creator>John Howard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike Neil, GM for virtualization strategy at Microsoft has written an interesting blog post on the Windows&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Microsoft’s Virtualization Direction</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#663376</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:05:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:663376</guid><dc:creator>Brian W. McCann</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike Neil (GM, Virtualization Strategy) of Microsoft has a wonderful post on the Windows Server Division's&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Microsoft licensing: bad for today's users</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#663559</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:02:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:663559</guid><dc:creator>VMTN Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We've posted the white paper Microsoft Virtualization Licensing and Distribution Terms, which lays out our concerns about some anti-consumer, anti-choice, and anti-ecosystem policies that Microsoft is choosing to implement. It goes into some detail around&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Where are we going with Virtualisation?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#664625</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:18:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:664625</guid><dc:creator>mcs.ireland.blog/infrastructure</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Much farther than many people know or expect. I will defer to the subject matter expert post here . This&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Virtualization Strategy</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#666793</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:58:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:666793</guid><dc:creator>tonyso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike Neil's blog post on the Microsoft Virtualization Strategy is an important read if you are in this&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The future is Virtual</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#675179</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:20:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:675179</guid><dc:creator>Insane World</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well at least a large part of it is. Microsoft have Virtualisation (sorry I&amp;amp;#39;m English, it is spelled&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Running Mac OS X on Virtual PC 2007</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#720508</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:48:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:720508</guid><dc:creator>The Sean Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As we have just announced over 1 MILLION downloads of Virtual PC 2007 (since its release on February&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Viridian and Virtual Server Timing Updates</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#754487</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:24:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:754487</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As the person who oversees the development plans, teams and strategy for Microsoft’s virtualization software on desktops and servers, I want to update everyone on the timing of our server virtualization offerings. I know that many of our customers and&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Impresionante; nuevas noticias sobre la estrategia de virtualización de Microsoft.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#758106</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:53:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:758106</guid><dc:creator>Be Geek My Friend</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Server BLOG: As the person who oversees the development plans, teams and strategy for Microsoft’s&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Viridian features update; beta planned for Longhorn RTM</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#924087</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:47:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:924087</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve made good progress with Windows Server virtualization: we’re taking customer nominations for the technology adoption program (TAP); we have interop agreements with both XenSource and Novell; partners have provided productive input on the platform&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Where we're headed with Virtualization</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#1153784</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:48:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1153784</guid><dc:creator>Microsoft TechNet Ireland Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;More often I get asked what is Microsoft's virtualization strategy - I know Dave Northey covered it off&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Virtualization team blog launched</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#1494391</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:12:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1494391</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;After much travels and demos, I'm glad to see Jeff Woolsey start blogging on virtualization. If you've been to WinHEC or TechEd the past couple years, Jeff has been the guy on stage to demo Windows Server virtualization and SCVMM. Jeff works for Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Virtualization team blog launched </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#1504127</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:17:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1504127</guid><dc:creator>Charles Aunger - Windows 64bit, Terminal Services, Citrix, Virtualization, Thin, Infrastructure </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome Jeff rocks.. After much travels and demos, glad to see Jeff Woolsey start blogging on virtualization&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Yes, Virginia, there is a Hyper-V beta</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#2643844</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:38:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2643844</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With a tip of the cap to Francis Church’s famous 1897 editorial, I’m very proud that the team has come through just like St. Nick. Today we announced the public availability of a beta of Hyper-V, the hypervisor-based virtualization feature in Windows&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Hyper-V beta released!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#2644163</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:21:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2644163</guid><dc:creator>Bink.nu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we announced the public availability of a beta of Hyper-V , the hypervisor-based virtualization&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Yes, Virginia, there is a Hyper-V beta</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx#2646483</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:32:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2646483</guid><dc:creator>Rod Trent at myITforum.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Source: Windows Server Division WebLog With a tip of the cap to Francis Church&amp;amp;rsquo;s famous 1897 editorial&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>