<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Other Rejected Longhorn Server Names</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx</link><description>As a follow-up to my last post regarding the official name of Windows Server code name "Longhorn", I thought it might be interesting for people to see some other names that have been touted during our brainstorming meetings, but that will never see the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Other Rejected Longhorn Server Names</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#440463</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 23:25:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:440463</guid><dc:creator>Kenny Kerr</dc:creator><description>You’re killing me! &amp;nbsp;:) &amp;nbsp;My bet is on “Windows Server 2007”...</description></item><item><title>re: Other Rejected Longhorn Server Names</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#440482</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:58:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:440482</guid><dc:creator>joe</dc:creator><description>How about Windows Server 5.4.xxxx or Windows Server 6.0.xxxx?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know it isn't cool and all, but would be nice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever you do, make sure the branding API doesn't have a stupid copyright symbol in it like Vista does. Those gomers are going to piss off legions of admins trying to do admin work from the command line because of that stupid symbol being stuck into Active Directory for the Operating System Name. Yeah I bugged that in the beta. It was initially closed because whomever fielded the bug figured it wasn't theres and that someone else had to do something and sent that to me like I can do anything about it. I contacted a friend inside of MSFT and got it reopened but it sounds like it is still not going to be fixed because no one seems to want to own up to the stupidity. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some people around there need to start using the command prompt more so they understand the issues associated with it and the decisions they make.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;joe</description></item><item><title>Windows Server &amp;quot;Longhorn&amp;quot;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#440523</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:16:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:440523</guid><dc:creator>Kieran Jacobsen's Security Chant and Rant</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Its Official...Windows Live Server</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#440524</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:20:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:440524</guid><dc:creator>Brian McCann</dc:creator><description>...is NOT going to be the next name for the&lt;br&gt;server product currently known as Longhorn.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; However...</description></item><item><title>What Windows Server Longhorn will not be called</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#441715</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:53:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:441715</guid><dc:creator>David Mackie's Blue Brain</dc:creator><description>Surfing around and reading blogs I found some comments from the Windows Server team about what Longhorn...</description></item><item><title>Locked, Unlocked...Whatever, I Just Want Access</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#447160</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:09:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:447160</guid><dc:creator>Active Directory Blog</dc:creator><description>A while back we had a customer contact us that was seeing something with authentication that they were...</description></item><item><title>What Windows Server Longhorn will not be called </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#453311</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:04:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:453311</guid><dc:creator>David Mackie's Blue Brain</dc:creator><description>Surfing around and reading blogs I found some comments from the Windows Server team about what Longhorn</description></item><item><title>The .NET Show: Windows Server &amp;amp;quot;Longhorn&amp;amp;quot;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2006/07/06/Other-Rejected-Longhorn-Server-Names.aspx#458004</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:00:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:458004</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server Division WebLog</dc:creator><description>JuliusS from our team and Volker Will from the developer platform evangelism team recently sat down with for The .NET Show to discuss Windows Server &amp;amp;quot;Longhorn&amp;amp;quot; and our server virtualization technologies. </description></item></channel></rss>