<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx</link><description>As we get closer to Beta 2 of Windows Server codenamed "Longhorn" - there will be a lot of talk on the bigger features that Longhorn will deliver....Network Access Protection, Read-Only Domain Controller, Server Core, Secure Startup, Role Management Tools,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#412912</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:29:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:412912</guid><dc:creator>Matt Baldwin</dc:creator><description>This is excellent news.  Look forward to it.  Do you have any other information or docs on the changes made to SMB in SMB2?  I'd be curious readnig more on it.  Thanks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-matt</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#412926</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:46:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:412926</guid><dc:creator>n00dles</dc:creator><description>Damn straight that's cool... I am struggling to see many reasons to upgrade clients to Vista (in an enterprise environment), but I'll be making sure we start dropping Longhorn Server as soon as it's RTM :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even the Unix guys gave props when I told them you can now build a Windows server without a GUI - man that is a long overdue improvement!</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#413192</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:36:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:413192</guid><dc:creator>Kevin M. Owen</dc:creator><description>These new features sound great!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would it be possible for you to expand on what you mean by &amp;quot;symbolic links over the new protocol?&amp;quot; Will junction points be able to target network shares?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, is there any chance of getting &amp;quot;Client Side Compression,&amp;quot; so that a file that has NTFS compression turned on will be sent over the wire compressed and decompressed by the client, rather than decompressed by the server and then sent over the wire (and vice versa)?</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#413215</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:413215</guid><dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator><description>Sounds Cool!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will SMB2 be a public free or licensable protocol?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#413331</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:12:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:413331</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>While I, as I'm sure you and everyone else sane, consider the original SMB protocol with its dozen+ variations to be quite a mess, I'd still like to see in writing:&lt;br&gt;1. Yes, we this time fully specified SMB2, and we did it good.&lt;br&gt;2. Yes, the specification will obviously be available to everyone and all from an RFC. (after all, wasn't that what MS tried to fool us all into with CIFS?)</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#413357</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:34:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:413357</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>Also will it be backwards compatible to support old clients ?</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#415781</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:44:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:415781</guid><dc:creator>Richard Gadsden</dc:creator><description>Will you make enough information public for the samba team to be able to support SMB2?</description></item><item><title>re: Longhorn Server - the little things mean a lot - SMB2 Protocol </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#442623</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:08:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:442623</guid><dc:creator>feroz</dc:creator><description>does any one know how to access a file share from windows vista / long horn server by ipv6 address...more over whether is there any support for ipv6 that &amp;nbsp;microsoft has provided??</description></item><item><title>Windows Vista: Crappier than expected &amp;laquo; The All Mighty Green One</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#589334</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:22:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:589334</guid><dc:creator>Windows Vista: Crappier than expected « The All Mighty Green One</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://tamgo.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/windows-vista-crappier-than-expected/"&gt;http://tamgo.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/windows-vista-crappier-than-expected/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Vista: Crappier than expected &amp;laquo; The All Mighty Green One</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#589657</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:55:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:589657</guid><dc:creator>Windows Vista: Crappier than expected « The All Mighty Green One</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://tamgo.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/windows-vista-crappier-than-expected/"&gt;http://tamgo.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/windows-vista-crappier-than-expected/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>TxF (Transacted NTFS) を使って RDBMS, MSMQ,,, と相互運用させる (RTM 版でばっちり動作します！)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#636983</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:56:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:636983</guid><dc:creator>松崎 剛 ブログ (Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki Blog)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;環境： Windows Vista Visual Studio 2005 (In this post, English follows) ============================ こんにちは。&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> bathroom vanities
</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#1662628</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:50:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1662628</guid><dc:creator> bathroom vanities
</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanities"&gt;http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanities&lt;/a&gt; bathroom vanities&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> bathroom vanities
</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#1662629</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:50:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1662629</guid><dc:creator> bathroom vanities
</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanities"&gt;http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanities&lt;/a&gt; bathroom vanities&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> bathroom faucets
</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#1684903</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:24:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1684903</guid><dc:creator> bathroom faucets
</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-faucets"&gt;http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-faucets&lt;/a&gt; bathroom faucets&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> bathroom sinks
</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#1696524</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:35:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1696524</guid><dc:creator> bathroom sinks
</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-sinks"&gt;http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-sinks&lt;/a&gt; bathroom sinks&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> bathroom vanity cabinet
</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#1702428</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:40:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1702428</guid><dc:creator> bathroom vanity cabinet
</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanity-cabinet"&gt;http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanity-cabinet&lt;/a&gt; bathroom vanity cabinet&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> bathroom vanity
</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#1703706</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:02:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1703706</guid><dc:creator> bathroom vanity
</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanity"&gt;http://bathroomdesign.greatnow.com/bathroom-vanity&lt;/a&gt; bathroom vanity&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>???????????????????????? Samba ???????????????? ???????????? ?? ?????????????????????????? Microsoft | ?????????????? ???? ???????? IT</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#2666164</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:36:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2666164</guid><dc:creator>???????????????????????? Samba ???????????????? ???????????? ?? ?????????????????????????? Microsoft | ?????????????? ???? ???????? IT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://itworldnews.ru/2007/12/21/software/programmisty-samba-poluchili-dostup-k-specifikaciyam-microsoft/"&gt;http://itworldnews.ru/2007/12/21/software/programmisty-samba-poluchili-dostup-k-specifikaciyam-microsoft/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Symbolic Link under SMB2 Protocol &amp;laquo; Pepe&amp;#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/10/20/412800.aspx#3211787</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:42:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3211787</guid><dc:creator>Symbolic Link under SMB2 Protocol &amp;laquo; Pepe&amp;#8217;s Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://pepe101de.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/symbolic-link-under-smb2-protocol/"&gt;http://pepe101de.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/symbolic-link-under-smb2-protocol/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>