<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SBS 2003 and VOIP Phone - Simple Setup Mistake</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/06/21/406644.aspx</link><description>I thought I would share a little story about my HUGE security oversight with my home SBS 2003 system. I thought it might be good to both to educate and to elucidate how easy it can be to compromise a system. (when you don’t pay attention) I should preface</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: SBS 2003 and VOIP Phone - Simple Setup Mistake</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/06/21/406644.aspx#406737</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:53:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406737</guid><dc:creator>Paul </dc:creator><description>Does it not grate with you that even ISA 2004 does not support VOIP yet? Support for SIP almost seems vital in this day and age, and I find it hilarious that the latest Messanger also uses SIP.(or not should i say through ISA)</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2003 and VOIP Phone - Simple Setup Mistake</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/06/21/406644.aspx#407202</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:52:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407202</guid><dc:creator>Jeremy Morton</dc:creator><description>I have nearly the same setup at home, but the VOIP device doesn't get a dial-tone, even sitting outside of my SBS 2003 server. I haven't had time to troubleshoot it yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One nice thing about ISA Server 2004 [among many] is that there is no LAT, and I don't believe this scenario could have bit you like it did with the way that you set up Networks in it.</description></item><item><title>Port Forwarding | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2005/06/21/406644.aspx#3185336</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:53:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3185336</guid><dc:creator>Port Forwarding | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/4213394-port-forwarding"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/4213394-port-forwarding&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>