Welcome to TechNet Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

The Goal Keeper Approach to Security

In my previous blog I made the case for a paradigm shift in the anti-virus industry. Today I found an interesting article that helps support my case. The article examines whether anti-virus engines (and their creators - the anti-virus vendors) are really doing anything useful, and do they really care?

http://www.emailbattles.com/archive/battles/virus_aadddbhadc_ia/

It seems that anti-virus engines and their parent companies are failing to protect us properly, so you are left with is a good old goal keeper approach to security on which anti-virus is based. It's a black-listing technology and black-listing is just not good enough when the stakes are so high

 

The ball is the virus, the goal is your business, the keeper is your current anti-virus solution

 

Published Monday, April 10, 2006 6:39 PM by wigunara
Filed under:

Comments

# re: The Goal Keeper Approach to Security

Monday, April 10, 2006 3:44 PM by sthorne
Steve (Lamb) made the point about who you trust with the whitelist, if you go that way. Is there a body somewhere you'd trust to be solely responsible for what you can run on your PC? I think there might be a trust issue if MS tried this :)

# re: The Goal Keeper Approach to Security

Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:13 PM by wigunara
Perhaps the certificates could be administered in a similar way to SSL certs, through third party certificate authorities such as VeriSign, Thawte, BT etc.
Anonymous comments are disabled
 
Page view tracker