<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Auto-site assignment and multiple IP addresses</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wemd_ua_-_sms_writing_team/archive/2008/03/28/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ip-addresses.aspx</link><description>It happens to all of us. Just when you think you’ve comfortably nailed a certain aspect of the product – Kapow! – the rug is pulled from under your feet and you realize you’re not on the stable ground you thought you were. It’s all part and parcel of</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Auto-site assignment and multiple IP addresses</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wemd_ua_-_sms_writing_team/archive/2008/03/28/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ip-addresses.aspx#3022970</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:16:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3022970</guid><dc:creator>anthonyclendenen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Carol,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't think this is a significant techncial change and here is why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would knowing the correct behavior change an administrator’s decision about whether to use auto-site assignment when a computer has multiple addresses? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would require that the site boundaries were IP boundaries and would require that a potential client was connected and had two IP's and that one of the IP's was outside of the boundaries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From what I see with customers they usually don't use the /AUTO switch with client installations using client push, GPO, batch files, so on. &amp;nbsp;They put in the site code, and why not. &amp;nbsp;Assuming they did use the /AUTO switch it would still mean that there was a 50% chance on the first try they are going to find the site code. &amp;nbsp;And how often will a client installation take place where a potential client is using more than one IP? &amp;nbsp;Over VPN? a wireless network? &amp;nbsp;Those don't describe most client installations these days, it is done as part of the OSD process, through a package (can't get that if you are outside the sites boundaries), or through the console. &amp;nbsp;So it is possible if they push the client from the console or with client push. &amp;nbsp;If they are using the client push there is a 50% chance they are going to get it tomorrow, if it is done by right clicking on a collection it still tries to find the site, it may find it before it gives up, 25 hours later, I forget how long it tries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the odds are pretty high that it will get the client.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would this information provide the missing information about why auto-site assignment failed? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, it would. &amp;nbsp;I have seen this questions come up a few times and I have told customers the first bound NIC rule.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthony&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>  Auto Site Assignment and Multiple IP's |  Config Manager</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wemd_ua_-_sms_writing_team/archive/2008/03/28/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ip-addresses.aspx#3022973</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:25:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3022973</guid><dc:creator>  Auto Site Assignment and Multiple IP's |  Config Manager</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://configmgr.com/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ips/"&gt;http://configmgr.com/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ips/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Auto Site Assignment and Multiple IP's</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wemd_ua_-_sms_writing_team/archive/2008/03/28/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ip-addresses.aspx#3022974</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:26:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3022974</guid><dc:creator>The Daily Ramblings of an SMS Engineer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Carol posted this over the the TechNet blogs site a couple of hours ago. I commented that I didn&amp;amp;#39;t&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Auto-site assignment and multiple IP addresses</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wemd_ua_-_sms_writing_team/archive/2008/03/28/auto-site-assignment-and-multiple-ip-addresses.aspx#3027579</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:07:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3027579</guid><dc:creator>sringler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As I was the customer reporting this topic, I just want to let you know that we are actually trying to get a DCR for this because as a result, about 5% of our clients are unmanaged and we have to use another product to patch these clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>