<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>I Hate to Bring This Up Again..</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2009/02/17/i-hate-to-bring-this-up-again.aspx</link><description>..but, once again, the dark underbelly of human nature has shown itself in my trackback pool.. Back in March of 2008, I went off on a little two - post rant about for-fee aggregators.&amp;#160; At the time, I said: For awhile now, I've been aware that there</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: I Hate to Bring This Up Again..</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2009/02/17/i-hate-to-bring-this-up-again.aspx#3203851</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:21:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3203851</guid><dc:creator>Jim F.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not in the least, to either of your questions. &amp;nbsp;That's not flattery -- that's thievery. &amp;nbsp;Worse, if somebody gets ripped off and wrongly accuses you, it could be a financial/legal mess even though you're innocent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: I Hate to Bring This Up Again..</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2009/02/17/i-hate-to-bring-this-up-again.aspx#3204021</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:27:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3204021</guid><dc:creator>aspiringgeek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ward, I, too, have been annoyed by folks copying-&amp;amp;-pasting my content. &amp;nbsp;I know a couple of *individuals* who've actually taken my content--egad!--as their own. &amp;nbsp;Plagiarism is the highest form of flattery, eh?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, misrepresenting content such as you have now described does indeed take things to a new level--a very low level. &amp;nbsp;I endorse your actions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I hope you don't mind if I plagiarize the idea. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jimmy&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: I Hate to Bring This Up Again..</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2009/02/17/i-hate-to-bring-this-up-again.aspx#3204069</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:19:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3204069</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan Kehayias</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think you are wrong at all for doing what you are doing. &amp;nbsp;Unless you gave them permission to reproduce your content, they have infringed on your rights, whether its legal or not. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>