<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Database Programming: Operator Precedence in DTS is a Matter of Inheritance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2008/05/09/database-programming-operator-precedence-in-dts-is-a-matter-of-inheritance.aspx</link><description>This post will (hopefully) close a thread which runs here and here . When we last addressed this issue, I mentioned that an answer to the operator precedence question for DTS raised by Scott R. would depend on either my research or the kindness of others.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Ward Pond's SQL Server blog : Database Programming: Operator Precedence In SQL Server</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2008/05/09/database-programming-operator-precedence-in-dts-is-a-matter-of-inheritance.aspx#3053205</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 03:49:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3053205</guid><dc:creator>Ward Pond's SQL Server blog : Database Programming: Operator Precedence In SQL Server</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2008/05/06/database-programming-operator-precedence-in-sql-server.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/wardpond/archive/2008/05/06/database-programming-operator-precedence-in-sql-server.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>