<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Application Streaming and SoftGrid - dual mode</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/23/application-streaming-and-softgrid-dual-mode.aspx</link><description>The was another great post up on the Citrix site that I really wanted to share that Joe Nord wrote up . It was specifically around using SoftGrid and Citrix Application Streaming. Its great to see so many from Citrix enjoying SoftGrid as a complementary</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Application Streaming and SoftGrid - dual mode</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/23/application-streaming-and-softgrid-dual-mode.aspx#2932078</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:22:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2932078</guid><dc:creator>Travis Guinn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Access Management Console: Publish application, application type as &amp;quot;content&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp; The &amp;quot;.SFT&amp;quot; file is the content.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe this is incorrect. The content should be the .OSD, not the .SFT&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Application Streaming and SoftGrid - dual mode</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualworld/archive/2008/02/23/application-streaming-and-softgrid-dual-mode.aspx#3030386</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:08:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3030386</guid><dc:creator>Morten Zweiss</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Travis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr Nord did say...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I haven't implemented this elegant version, but it should work.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you suggesting that Mr Nord has not tried out the inelegant one or, maybe, failed to document his method correctly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Morten&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>