<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rumor Mill: Dispelling the &amp;quot;Microsoft Virtualization is not Ready for 'Prime Time'&amp;quot; Myth...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2008/07/08/rumor-mill-dispelling-the-microsoft-virtualization-ready-for-prime-time-myth.aspx</link><description>Greetings! Chris Steffen here again from Kroll Factual Data. I want to share some thoughts on what I have heard about Microsoft virtualization in the enterprise data center. I will also be the first to admit that I am not the average user of Microsoft’s</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Rumor Mill: Dispelling the "Microsoft Virtualization is not Ready for 'Prime Time'" Myth...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2008/07/08/rumor-mill-dispelling-the-microsoft-virtualization-ready-for-prime-time-myth.aspx#3086497</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:52:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3086497</guid><dc:creator>wanderson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The place where we all need more information is on the competitive story in heterogeneous environments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no doubt in my mind that Hyper-V is the choice in homogenous microsoft-stack environments, particularly if thec ustomer already has Hyper-V enabled windows server 2008 licenses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difficulty in discerning the support status for the ridiculous number of linux and UNIX flavors out there make it difficult for an IT shop or a consulting firm to be able to more aggressively market the Hyper-V platform in mixed spaces.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>http://dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8165</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2008/07/08/rumor-mill-dispelling-the-microsoft-virtualization-ready-for-prime-time-myth.aspx#3089928</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:35:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3089928</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Opinion: VMware, Microsoft Virtualization Pitches Miss the Most Practical Issues</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2008/07/08/rumor-mill-dispelling-the-microsoft-virtualization-ready-for-prime-time-myth.aspx#3100104</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:15:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3100104</guid><dc:creator>HyperVoria</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Kevin Fogarty: One of the major drawbacks of Microsoft &amp;amp;#39;s virtualization pitch is the lack of good&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>