<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Great source of Hyper-V performance oriented information</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2008/06/17/great-source-of-hyper-v-performance-oriented-information.aspx</link><description>Virtualization Nation, Greetings! Quick note today. :-) If you are looking for some good performance oriented information on Hyper-V please check out Tony Voellm's blog. Tony is the Hyper-V Performance Team Lead, Performance Architect, Performance Nut,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Great source of Hyper-V performance oriented information</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/archive/2008/06/17/great-source-of-hyper-v-performance-oriented-information.aspx#3074547</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:29:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3074547</guid><dc:creator>chrpai</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there an expected timeline for Hyper-V RTM to ship? &amp;nbsp;Also, what was the rational for including a beta version with a release version of server? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;As an outsider, this is puzzling to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've been using VirtualServer 2005 for a couple of years now and I'm considering making the switch but I don't want to run beta software.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>