> (they say imitation is the sincerest form of
> flattery!)
Sure, they're flattering the same author that you flatter. I was going to say they're flattering virtually the same author that you flatter, but that wouldn't work because he's really the same author. (Does this need a smiley? OK, here goes: Just Kiddering.)
Norman Diamond
10 Jun 2005 5:02 AM
Nick
10 Jun 2005 5:25 PM
What has me excited about this is how Microsoft plans to implement "hypervisor". I mean, I'm sure they could just extend Virtual Server 2005 and tie it into the OS... but I wonder if we'll get a new approach... like being able to virtualize services... Say I want to run my Exchange services virtualized, will hypervisor provision a server, run network access quarantine, and patch it? I blogged about this the other day here...
http://addicted-to-it.blogspot.com/2005/06/longhorn-virtualization-hypervisor.html
This has the potential to be a revolutionary new feature. I guess worst-case it will be better than Virtual Server 2005 (which is already a great tool).
shemales pictures
31 Jan 2007 11:03 AM
Superb! (I wrote something else and then I read below that I aint supposed ter. So I deleted it.)
shemales stories
1 Feb 2007 3:05 AM
Superb! (I wrote something else and then I read below that I aint supposed ter. So I deleted it.)
shemales pictures
1 Feb 2007 4:21 PM
Superb! (I wrote something else and then I read below that I aint supposed ter. So I deleted it.)
Douglas
5 Jun 2013 5:11 PM
Where I found some docs about Windows failover cluster?
