• How to install and update the .NET Framework 1.1 on different operating systems

    I've blogged previously about how confusing our servicing story is for .NET Framework 1.1 on Windows Server 2003 and 64-bit versions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. Now there's a new KB article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base to help customers understand and address these and other issues regarding .NET Framework 1.1 on various operating systems.

    Here are some links:

    KB Number 915756
    Title How to install and update the .NET Framework 1.1 on different operating systems
    Link http://support.microsoft.com/?id=915756
  • Changes

    You may have noticed that I haven't been maintaining this blog recently. Some life changes have happened in my life and as a result I am no longer actively working on "Update deployment for Visual Studio and the .NET Framework." Specifically, I've gotten engaged and moved from Redmond, WA to Silicon Valley, CA where I am now helping Microsoft deliver the next version of Office for Macintosh systems. You can rest assured that the update deployment space for Visual Studio and .NET Framework are left in good hands back in Redmond.

    I am leaving this site online as a resource (for what it's worth). I consider this to be my personal blog for information pertaining to my current role at Microsoft: If and when I choose to start blogging on this site again, I may change blog title to better reflect the current subject matter but will strive to leave any existing content online.

  • Glossary

    Microsoft Installer
    See MSI.
    MSI
    Microsoft Installer; also called Windows Installer. cf.: OCM. Microsoft application installer technology: [More Info]. Installation technology used by all versions of Visual Studio. Also used by all "Redistributable" versions of the .NET Framework.
    OCM
    Optional Component Manager. cf.: MSI. Microsoft installer technology for operating system components. For example, this is generally the technology used by all components under "Add/Remove Windows Components" in Add/Remove Programs. Installation technology used by the .NET Framework 1.0 on Windows XP Tablet PC Edition and Media Center Edition, and by the .NET Framework 1.1 on 32-bit x86 versions of Windows Server 2003. All other versions of the .NET Framework use MSI on these platforms.
    Optional Component Manager
    See OCM.
    Windows Installer
    See MSI.
  • About the Author

    My name is Blair Neumann and I am the Microsoft Program Manager in charge of update deployment for the Developer Division Customer Product-lifecycle Experience (DD.CPX) team.  That's a long way of saying that I am the person in charge of getting product updates (service packs and hotfixes) for Visual Studio and the .NET Framework into distribution channels like Windows Update, Microsoft Update, and the Microsoft Download Center.  Okay, that was longer.

    I started doing this full-time in August, 2005.  I had been the go-to guy in QA for update deployment issues on the same team for about the year and a half previous.

    I love the update deployment space.  I truly believe that every single update that we deliver helps make the internet a better and safer place.

    I grew up about a mile from Microsoft main campus and literally watched it grow.  It was always a dream of mine to work here.

    Stepping back, I took a bachelor's degree in Psychology before deciding to enter the tech world as the dot-com bubble was still forming.  I did product support for Windows 98 the day that it shipped and later helped test Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows Millennium Edition.  I was away from Microsoft between 2000 and 2003 during which time I helped to develop in-flight email services and went back to school to brush up on my Computer Science fundamentals.  I dropped out of CS graduate school in 2003 (in good standing) to join Microsoft full-time.  The rest of this history can be found above.

  • About the Role: Update Deployment PM

    In the bad old days, before specialized update deployment program management, it was the responsibility of the update release manager to deploy their own updates.  And in a sense, things haven't really changed so much from the bad old days, except that they have.  Let me explain.

    Believe it or not, getting important hotfixes and service packs into the hands of millions of customers worldwide is a somewhat complicated thing to do.  A recent security update from our team consisted of over 100 unique packages (patch executables), each functionally equivalent (that is, each contained the same logical fix), but each targeting a unique subsection of the .NET Framework ecosystem.  And believe it or not, exactly one of my colleagues was responsible for that update end-to-end.

    The fix itself was easy, it was packing and deploying that fix that was complex.  Over 100 unique packages deployed via three versions of Windows Update, one managed network security tool, and the Microsoft Download Center, all with an international focus.  All in all, there were something like 400 unique ways that an arbitrary customer could get this necessary fix.

    My colleague worked extraordinarily long hours with many sleepless nights (seriously) to get it out the door as fast as humanly possible before the black hats could do their worst.  That time frame was on the order of six months.

    Getting all of that done was a full-time job for my colleague for literally months on end, and these were months after the update packages were already signed-off by everybody else: The bits were golden, my colleague just needed to get them into our customers' hands.  But what makes this story tragic is that it didn't need to be that way.  Most of that deployment work could have been done in parallel with the earlier work, the only reason it wasn't was a resource constraint: my colleague was only one person and the work required could have been more efficiently performed by two.  In this case, two resources instead of one could have literally cut the end-to-end time in half.

    Those were the bad old days.  Those days are past.  Today we recognize that much of this deployment work can be done in parallel with other activities.  That's where the update deployment manager role comes in.  It's my job to help streamline the process: Get updates into customers' hands faster by parallelizing the work and specializing in deployment.

    In a sense, things haven't changed so much at all.  If the same security issue were felt today, my colleague would still own the issue end-to-end.  What would be different is that my colleague would now have the support of resources dedicated to facilitating the deployment aspects of the update release.  In a nutshell, that's what I do: I do everything that I can day-to-day to make sure that valuable updates are delivered efficiently to exactly the right customers.  It's a complex mission (as I am hoping this blog will help to show), but it is both achievable and necessary.  I definitely feel up to the challenge.