The Reading Eighteenhttp://blogs.technet.com/ukmail/atom.xmlCommunity Server2008-07-29T15:44:00Zhttp://blogs.technet.com/ukmail/archive/2008/09/24/step-by-step-guide-on-failing-over-from-ccr-to-scr.aspx2008-09-24T17:15:00Z2008-09-24T17:15:00ZThere's a very good TechNet article available that describes the steps that are required in order to fail over from a CCR cluster in one site, to an SCR target in another site. It also covers the procedure to fail back once the problem has been resolved. Standby Continuous Replication: Site Resilience with Standby Clustering http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb738150(EXCHG.80).aspx Posted by Chris Stevenson...(<a href="http://blogs.technet.com/ukmail/archive/2008/09/24/step-by-step-guide-on-failing-over-from-ccr-to-scr.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3127759" width="1" height="1">ukpfemchttp://blogs.technet.com/members/ukpfemc.aspxhttp://blogs.technet.com/ukmail/archive/2008/07/29/mail-routing-with-a-single-namespace-during-migration-co-existence.aspx2008-07-29T17:44:00Z2008-07-29T17:44:00ZI've been spending quite a lot of time looking at mail routing options using a shared namespace - not something most people tend to do, however quite important in this case :-) I found some information at MSExchange.org that helps clarify the routing mechanism that takes place in Exchange 2007, and when to use the different types of relay options available. In this case we wanted to be able to route mail from a hosted service to an IMAP-based platform while in co-existence mode. This would use the...(<a href="http://blogs.technet.com/ukmail/archive/2008/07/29/mail-routing-with-a-single-namespace-during-migration-co-existence.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3095297" width="1" height="1">ukpfemchttp://blogs.technet.com/members/ukpfemc.aspx