<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Fat and PasteOff?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tristank/archive/2005/02/02/365304.aspx</link><description>Ah, the Sean Connery accent PasteOff jokes just keep on rolling. Matt noted that PasteOff is a "huge memory hog", using 12 MB from a cold start and 24 when noodling around after a while. It's working set bloat! It's not my fault! If it bugs you (and it's</description><dc:language>en-AU</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Fat and PasteOff?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tristank/archive/2005/02/02/365304.aspx#369070</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:369070</guid><dc:creator>wamatt</dc:creator><description>You are right about the cheat method. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its such wierd behaviour, I minimised it and it went from 24mb to 680k, then I maximised it and it went to 8mb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go figure! :)</description></item></channel></rss>