<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>LCSKid</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/default.aspx</link><description>LCS and OCS Product Information</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Where are OC 2007 R2 Recent Contacts stored?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/11/20/where-are-oc-2007-r2-recent-contacts-stored.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:50:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3295433</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3295433.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3295433</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;A customer question was raised about wanting to delete the Recent Contacts entry list for users due to some alias changes and migrations. Nobody knew the answer right away and I was pretty sure it would be in the backend database somewhere. Turns out it is kept client side. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;If you want to know WHERE the recent contacts are, they are under this path HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Communicator\&amp;lt;sip-uri of user&amp;gt;\GroupStateCacheU\~~&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Deleting the ~~ or GroupStateCacheU folders is not sufficient to clear the recent contact list, you must delete the key for the &amp;lt;sip-uri of user&amp;gt;. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;You have to exit the client before making the change and all caveats about the impact on directly editing the registry apply – do so at your own risk and testing. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;How did they figure this out? I haven’t gotten an answer to that but knowing the answer I know 1 way to do it now – &lt;a href="http://www.Sysinternals.com"&gt;http://www.Sysinternals.com&lt;/a&gt; Process Monitor. I added 2 filters the default list, the first one was Process Name is Communicator.exe Include and the second filter was Path Beings With HKCU\software\Microsoft\communicator Include. Deleting the contact in my Recent Contact list didn’t trigger the path we now know about nor did sending an IM to a new contact. It was when I toggled the display of Recent Contacts in the client that I saw the path. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Doing this in reverse is not fair to those who dug on this to begin with but it reinforces things we value – Sysinternals tools and things we know – the path for monitoring user registry settings for communicator. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Have a great weekend&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3295433" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007/default.aspx">OCS 2007</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Communicator/default.aspx">Communicator</category></item><item><title>OCS 2007 R2 and Windows 2008 R2 – what is the status?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/11/19/ocs-2007-r2-and-windows-2008-r2-what-is-the-status.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:25:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3295242</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3295242.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3295242</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite easily the most active topic of discussion we have going right now, internally, customers, MVP’s, Master’s, Moms and Dads, it seems everyone wants to know. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The problem is that the answer is simple despite each group trying to tweak the discussion to the nuance of their deployment need or desire. Want to know the answer? It isn’t hidden, but publicly stated here - &lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/supported-applications.aspx" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/supported-applications.aspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/supported-applications.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;You are more than welcome to contact me via the blog but I guarantee you we have heard the question before and the answer is still in that link above. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Putting aside the humor, the good news about issues like this is that we are working through testing of a full deployment, not just 1 or 2 roles or scenarios but a full test matrix and that is complex and takes time especially if you run into an issue that you need to investigate and maybe even wait for a fix. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Three cheers to the Sustained Engineering team for persisting through the work and the continued questions. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3295242" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category></item><item><title>UCVUG Dec ‘09: Response Groups</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/11/17/ucvug-dec-09-response-groups.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:44:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3294422</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3294422.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3294422</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The Microsoft Unified Communications Virtual User Group (UCVUG) will be hosting it's quarterly meeting on &lt;strong&gt;December 8th, 2009 at 2:00 PM Eastern Time (-5 GMT). &lt;/strong&gt;This event will be broadcast online via Microsoft Live Meeting. Please register if&amp;#160; you plan to attend so that we can get a count of how many attendees to plan for.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.ucvug.org/Home.aspx" href="http://www.ucvug.org/Home.aspx"&gt;http://www.ucvug.org/Home.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Dustin is doing a great job trying to establish this group and welcomes feedback on future topics and other items you will find value in. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3294422" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Response+Groups/default.aspx">Response Groups</category></item><item><title>ToninoF launches blog with Office Communicator SIP Trace Analysis – Registration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/11/02/toninof-launches-blog-with-office-communicator-sip-trace-analysis-registration.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:54:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3290862</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3290862.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3290862</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the first projects I had when joining this team was working with a team of top level Microsoft Consultants along with the customers in the OCS 2007 and 2007 R2 TAP (technology adoption program). That was my first time working with the top tier of our consultants and it also was an eye opener to the skills across the globe. Tonino was one of the team members that I had no prior working experience with but I quickly valued his technical and communication skills. Tonino has launched his blog with a very detailed post for SIP Trace Analysis. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://blogs.technet.com/toninof/" href="http://blogs.technet.com/toninof/"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/toninof/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3290862" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category></item><item><title>The value of history and your elders</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/10/15/the-value-of-history-and-your-elders.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:02:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3287204</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3287204.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3287204</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Today as part of a program I am participating in I was able to hear from Bill Buxton, Principal Researcher with Microsoft Research. The historical knowledge of touch interfaces he possessed was fascinating. I appreciate how he mentioned that with poor definitions for touch interfaces the keyboard is a touch interface. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Below are just 4 examples of technology that existed in our history that I found amazing, absolutely amazing. He made a statement along the lines of, within Microsoft we have all the people who know the history of modern day computing. As I thought about this, I realized that it was a current day example of the need to value our older generations. I can remember as a kid going to IBM with my dad and walking down a hallway and the entire room that we walked past was ‘the’ computer. Obviously my Dad would know more about that piece of equipment and someone 10-20 years older would know even more. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I put these in the order of how I personally found them fascinating &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~palen/courses/5919/F09/videos_2/wang_freestyle_video.html"&gt;Wang Freestyle&lt;/a&gt; – make sure to select the Videos link and see the other historical systems. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Simon"&gt;IBM Simon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pocketcalculatorshow.com/nerdwatch/"&gt;Casio watch&lt;/a&gt; – see the link for Finger-trace for a picture. From the article linked below: &amp;quot;I have a Casio watch that I bought in 1984,&amp;quot; Buxton says. &amp;quot;It allows me to use my finger to operate a calculator. I was able to trace '1 + 1 =' on the screen and it would say '2'. That's how long this stuff has been available.&amp;quot;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato_computer" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato_computer"&gt;Plato IV Computer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;For a small bit of reading here is &lt;a href="http://billbuxton.com/"&gt;Bill’s site&lt;/a&gt; and an &lt;a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wired/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501834&amp;amp;objectid=10597455&amp;amp;pnum=0"&gt;article discussing touch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3287204" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Off+Topic/default.aspx">Off Topic</category></item><item><title>Innovative web page using pictures with presence - Wortell</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/10/14/innovative-web-page-using-pictures-with-presence-wortell.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:45:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3286867</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3286867.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3286867</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;One of our Microsoft Gold Certified Partners has a great page showing their team with images for their presence status. Today you don’t have the ability to invoke an IM but that is rumored to be coming in the future. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wortell.nl/nl-nl/ourpeople/pages/onze-mensen.aspx"&gt;http://www.wortell.nl/nl-nl/ourpeople/pages/onze-mensen.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/toml/WindowsLiveWriter/Innovativewebpageusingpictureswithpresen_A53F/image_2.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/toml/WindowsLiveWriter/Innovativewebpageusingpictureswithpresen_A53F/image_thumb.png" width="443" height="224" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3286867" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category></item><item><title>Urgent: Known issue under investigation with KB974571 and LCS/OCS</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/10/14/urgent-known-issue-under-investigation-with-kb974571-and-lcs-ocs.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:29:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3286835</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3286835.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3286835</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;October 15 Update: Main blog post has been updated to reflect the addition of Known Issues in the patch article&amp;#160; &lt;a title="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974571" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974571"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974571&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Please be notified of this issue &lt;a title="http://communicationsserverteam.com/archive/2009/10/14/632.aspx" href="http://communicationsserverteam.com/archive/2009/10/14/632.aspx"&gt;http://communicationsserverteam.com/archive/2009/10/14/632.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;We need to alert you to an issue that is under investigation with the applying of KB974571 (MS09-056: Vulnerabilities in CryptoAPI could allow spoofing) that will cause the LCS or OCS server to show running with the evaluation version and then noting it as expired.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;The post below provides a great write up for reference and for the sake of those using a reader I will also reproduce that content. &lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Doug’s link and post content&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://blogs.technet.com/dodeitte/archive/2009/10/13/do-not-apply-kb974571-to-lcs-ocs-servers.aspx" href="http://blogs.technet.com/dodeitte/archive/2009/10/13/do-not-apply-kb974571-to-lcs-ocs-servers.aspx"&gt;&lt;strike&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/dodeitte/archive/2009/10/13/do-not-apply-kb974571-to-lcs-ocs-servers.aspx&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Update #1 - Until this issue can be resolved, I am only suggesting that you either hold off on deploying this update, or test very throughly to make sure that this won't cause an outage in your environment.&amp;#160; Security updates are VERY important, and once this issue is resolved, you should deploy this update to all of your LCS/OCS servers. &lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Currently an issue is being observed after applying KB974571 (MS09-056: Vulnerabilities in CryptoAPI could allow spoofing) to LCS/OCS servers, that is causing them to believe that they are running an evaluation version of LCS/OCS and that it has expired.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974571/"&gt;&lt;strike&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974571/&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;If you apply the patch, the LCS/OCS services fail to start and you see these errors in the event log:&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Event Type:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Error      &lt;br /&gt;Event Source:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Live Communications Server       &lt;br /&gt;Event Category:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; (1000)       &lt;br /&gt;Event ID:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 12290       &lt;br /&gt;Date:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 10/13/2009       &lt;br /&gt;Time:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 8:28:57 PM       &lt;br /&gt;User:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; N/A       &lt;br /&gt;Computer:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; &lt;br /&gt;Description:       &lt;br /&gt;The evaluation period for Microsoft Office Live Communication Server 2005 has expired. Obtain the released version of this product and upgrade to the non-evaluation version by running setup.exe&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;For more information, see Help and Support Center at &lt;/strike&gt;&lt;a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp"&gt;&lt;strike&gt;http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strike&gt;.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Event Type:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Error      &lt;br /&gt;Event Source:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Live Communications Server       &lt;br /&gt;Event Category:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; (1000)       &lt;br /&gt;Event ID:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 16417       &lt;br /&gt;Date:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 10/13/2009       &lt;br /&gt;Time:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 8:28:57 PM       &lt;br /&gt;User:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; N/A       &lt;br /&gt;Computer:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; &lt;br /&gt;Description:       &lt;br /&gt;Unable to initialize the protocol stack. The service has to stop.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;For more information, see Help and Support Center at &lt;/strike&gt;&lt;a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp"&gt;&lt;strike&gt;http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strike&gt;.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Event Type:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Error      &lt;br /&gt;Event Source:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Live Communications Server       &lt;br /&gt;Event Category:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; (1000)       &lt;br /&gt;Event ID:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 12299       &lt;br /&gt;Date:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 10/13/2009       &lt;br /&gt;Time:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; 8:28:57 PM       &lt;br /&gt;User:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; N/A       &lt;br /&gt;Computer:&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; &lt;br /&gt;Description:       &lt;br /&gt;The service is shutting down due to an internal error.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Error Code: 0xC3ED0804.      &lt;br /&gt;Resolution:       &lt;br /&gt;Check the previous event log entries and resolve them. Restart the server. If the problem persists contact product support.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;For more information, see Help and Support Center at &lt;/strike&gt;&lt;a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp"&gt;&lt;strike&gt;http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strike&gt;.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;Uninstalling the patch is the only way to currently fix this issue.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;The issue is currently being escalated, but until a fix can be found, delaying the install of KB974571 is recommended.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3286835" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>UC How To and UC Adoption and Training Kit</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/10/09/uc-how-to-and-uc-adoption-and-training-kit.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:47:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3285860</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3285860.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3285860</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I found these resources a few months back and failed to blog about them for some reason. These represent content that is created with and for our own deployment as well as customer deployments. I like that the UC How To can be modified for the workload of the end user. If you have feedback on this content feel free to use the contact form as I don’t mind emailing you or calling you for follow up. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;amp;FamilyID=aba240af-b5ba-4e14-bc12-c98eae1f6d15"&gt;UC How To&lt;/a&gt; The Microsoft Unified Communications “How-To” training tool is a Microsoft Silverlight™ 2 application that provides step-by-step instructions for common UC tasks. You can customize the How-To application to your company’s needs based on the UC features you’ve installed. For example, if you have installed all UC features except Communicator Mobile and Communicator Group Chat, you can modify the XML file so that those features and topics do not appear in the interface. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;amp;FamilyID=eb18d016-64f7-4aae-b491-65636a186c1a"&gt;Unified Communications Adoption and Training Kit 2007 R2&lt;/a&gt; The Unified Communications Adoption and Training Kit for 2007 R2 provides guidance and resources for IT Pros, Helpdesk, and Trainers to speed adoption and usage of Unified Communications technologies in the enterprise. The kit includes Planning Checklists, Awareness materials, including Poster, Door Hangers, and E-mail samples, and User Education Materials such as Quick Reference Cards, Flash Cards, and links to Web-based Training. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3285860" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Events_2F00_Training/default.aspx">Events/Training</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Communicator/default.aspx">Communicator</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category></item><item><title>Looking for information on upgrading OCPE (Tanjay)?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/10/06/looking-for-information-on-upgrading-ocpe-tanjay.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3285135</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3285135.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3285135</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Rick Varvel, Microsoft Consulting Services comes through with another great paper. I mentioned his papers for the Edge Server in the past and he has now dedicated time to the OC Phone Edition (OCPE, Tanjay) upgrade process. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Due to some of our programs purchasing devices in advance of program needs for budget reasons we ended up with multiple firmware versions. In fact we even had devices with the .199 build for which Rick was testing with. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is the text of his blog and url - &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;This document provides best practices for upgrading an OCPE device (Tanjay) from build 199 to 522 and then to 6907 using just the Office Communications Server 2007 R2 (OCS 2007 R2) Device Update service. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;For those familiar with the process, there is a high level walkthrough in the “&lt;B&gt;OCPE Device Upgrade Steps (Summary Version)&lt;/B&gt;” section; otherwise the detailed process begins with the Step 1 in the “&lt;B&gt;OCPE Device Upgrade Steps (Detailed Version)&lt;/B&gt;” section.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;Also included:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080 size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;Background information on how the different Tanjay firmware builds behave during the sign in and download process to assist with troubleshooting &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;Environmental dependency settings for DHCP, NTP, certificates, and DNS&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;Pool configuration changes required to successfully sign in and upgrade a Tanjay &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;Syntax examples and a sample scenario to simplify the deployment process &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;A sample NetMon trace file highlighting a successful sign in and upgrade &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;Log file locations and URLs used in troubleshooting common issues &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000080&gt;An Appendix with step by step instructions for many common tasks&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title=http://blogs.technet.com/rickva/archive/2009/10/03/ocpe-device-tanjay-upgrade-guide.aspx href="http://blogs.technet.com/rickva/archive/2009/10/03/ocpe-device-tanjay-upgrade-guide.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.technet.com/rickva/archive/2009/10/03/ocpe-device-tanjay-upgrade-guide.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/rickva/archive/2009/10/03/ocpe-device-tanjay-upgrade-guide.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3285135" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007/default.aspx">OCS 2007</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Telephony/default.aspx">Telephony</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Communicator/default.aspx">Communicator</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Tools/default.aspx">Tools</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Devices/default.aspx">Devices</category></item><item><title>OCS End User Experience – my devices are bad…</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/10/02/ocs-end-user-experience-my-devices-are-bad.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:03:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3284597</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3284597.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3284597</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a meeting today with my team of which we all work remote (Washington State, Colorado, Ohio, North Carolina, New York, Denmark and Switzerland). Obviously we all work with Office Communications Server technology and thus know quite a bit about doing things right. To add to this my work this year is to help with various end user experience issues within the company as well as with customers. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This actually started yesterday when I was dropped from a call and connected back with my mobile phone. There was a brief comment about a better device this time. The other device was one listed on the optimized device list but when I use it there is almost a comment about echo or being in a tunnel. I unplugged the device and threw it in the draw. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So today it was a bit embarrassing to have folks say they stopped hearing me despite me hearing them. So I ran the audio tuning wizard and all seemed ok until it happened again. The suggestion was to remove the webcam given we are working over home DSL connections (and wireless for me). Doing that showed that somehow it was the audio device despite the tuning. This webcam was not listed on the optimized device and I knew it but I haven’t purchased a supported webcam given how infrequent we need them.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Both devices have been properly placed in the trash today. I no longer want to hear about problems. This leaves me with my Jabra GN 2000 headset but I will be asking our admins if other devices are available including a webcam. I would choose a High Definition model but I don’t have a quad proc laptop :) &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The one thing that troubles me most is I don’t know if my logs are helpful in this situation or not so I will be investigating. Get an optimized device and if you keep hear reoccurring comments on one, maybe your setup just isn’t right for it (speakerphone) so consider another one.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3284597" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/VoIP/default.aspx">VoIP</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Communicator/default.aspx">Communicator</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Devices/default.aspx">Devices</category></item><item><title>Updated article for UC Clients in Application Virtualization environments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/09/29/updated-article-for-uc-clients-in-application-virtualization-environments.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3283912</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3283912.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3283912</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;See article &lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951152" mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951152"&gt;Support for the Microsoft unified communications clients in Application Virtualization environments&lt;/A&gt; for updates on the client feature support in a virtualized environment. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Key words for folks concerned about this area include – Citrix, Terminal Services, Remote Call Control, sharing, and meetings. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3283912" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>UC World - On Demand Why UC? Why Now? A Conversation with Gurdeep Singh-Pall</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/09/29/uc-world-on-demand-why-uc-why-now-a-conversation-with-gurdeep-singh-pall.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:30:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3283893</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3283893.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3283893</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;In the event you have not heard about UC World, allow me to share the site and information on one of the speakers. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Website: &lt;a href="http://www.ucworld.com"&gt;http://www.ucworld.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;To truly explore the question: Why UC, Why Now?, we have taken the opportunity to speak with one of the unified communications industry's most noted thought leaders, Gurdeep Singh-Pall, Corporate Vice President for the Unified Communications Group at Microsoft. In his role, Gurdeep leads the vision, product strategy, and R&amp;amp;D for Microsoft's Unified Communications offerings. For nearly 20 years, Gurdeep has played various integral roles at Microsoft. Recognized as one of the 15 Innovators &amp;amp; Influencers Who Will Make A Difference by Information Week, Gurdeep shares his thoughts on what UC is, what immediate benefits can be realized by organizations, and his vision for UC over the next five to seven years.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Disclosure – My role had involved me working with Aspect on their internal deployment during the OCS 2007 beta. As part of that work, I have a very high opinion of the internal Aspect IT team and their skills. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3283893" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Events_2F00_Training/default.aspx">Events/Training</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category></item><item><title>OC 2007 R2 and PIC with AIM Express</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/09/11/oc-2007-r2-and-pic-with-aim-express.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3280591</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3280591.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3280591</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;October 1, 2009 Update - The issue has been resolved.&amp;nbsp;Please do note the details below as some&amp;nbsp;have mistaken other problems for this. &lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A quick heads up on an issue we are looking to resolve. Currently if an AOL user is signed in to AIM Express an OC 2007 R2 client will see their presence state but will not be able to initiate an IM to the AOL user. If the user logged in to AIM Express first sends an IM to the OC 2007 R2 client then the conversation is successful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;While we have reproduced this with a few accounts consistently there also some accounts that it does not reproduce with. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No ETA for an update but worth mentioning. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3280591" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/PIC/default.aspx">PIC</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Communicator/default.aspx">Communicator</category></item><item><title>0-1-492 in Communicator Web Access 2007 R2 on Windows 2008 (French)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/09/09/0-1-492-in-communicator-web-access-2007-r2-on-windows-2008-french.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3280066</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3280066.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3280066</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;We had some discussion among our MVP and OCS Master’s teams about 0-1-492 errors with CWA. Benoit mentioned having an existing blog post in French. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://unifiees.blogspot.com/" href="http://unifiees.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://unifiees.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I used the Bing translator option to read in English. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3280066" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/CWA+Communicator+Web+Access/default.aspx">CWA Communicator Web Access</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/OCS+2007+R2/default.aspx">OCS 2007 R2</category></item><item><title>OT: The glorious empty inbox &lt;ahh&gt;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/2009/09/04/ot-the-glorious-empty-inbox-ahh.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:28:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3279294</guid><dc:creator>toml-lcskid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/comments/3279294.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/toml/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3279294</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many I receive a good amount of email, as well due to Xobni, I found I also send a lot of email which made me realize I am probably the cause of most of my email volume. Anyway I really try hard to manage my inbox so that I never have more mail than fits on a screen, typically between 20-50 messages. Today I reached a moment, trust me I know its a moment (2 messages came in while typing this sentence) of no unread email and 1 message in the Inbox. I will admit that I did mark 2 folders as unread but I could easily simply stop subscribing to the distribution group so I don’t feel bad about that.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Also I will readily admit that the empty inbox is like a white washed tomb, the ugliness is that I still have a bunch of work and action items to follow up on, and thus I have only mastered 1 minor part of the overall organization effort. I have been using OneNote for about 2 years now for project work and this year I started by including my fiscal year 2010 commitments in there to formulate my reporting and assessment around. I hope this keeps me on task and successful. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;So I will take this small victory right before the Labor Day weekend (and pray there isn’t an email backlog just waiting to release its fury on me)! &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/toml/WindowsLiveWriter/OTThegloriousemptyinboxahh_F58B/image_2.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/toml/WindowsLiveWriter/OTThegloriousemptyinboxahh_F58B/image_thumb.png" width="402" height="317" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;TomL LCSKid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3279294" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Off+Topic/default.aspx">Off Topic</category><category domain="http://blogs.technet.com/toml/archive/tags/Outlook/default.aspx">Outlook</category></item></channel></rss>