<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Virtualization Rocks</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/techblog/archive/2009/04/22/why-virtualization-rocks.aspx</link><description>TechBlog has been whiling away the hours lately testing virtualization solutions, including Microsoft's freely available Virtual PC 2007. Why? Well, I just got this new computer, see -- and it came with a 64-bit OS.... A few random thoughts: 1) Windows</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Topics about Microsoft  &amp;raquo; Why Virtualization Rocks</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/techblog/archive/2009/04/22/why-virtualization-rocks.aspx#3229583</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:55:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3229583</guid><dc:creator>Topics about Microsoft  &amp;raquo; Why Virtualization Rocks</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://microsoft.linkedz.info/2009/04/22/why-virtualization-rocks/"&gt;http://microsoft.linkedz.info/2009/04/22/why-virtualization-rocks/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>