<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DHCP Server Performance in Windows Server 2008 R2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/teamdhcp/archive/2009/06/29/dhcp-server-performance-in-windows-server-2008-r2.aspx</link><description>This blog post details the performance improvement of DHCP Server in Windows Server 2008 R2 over prior releases. The results published are from a lab environment.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: DHCP Server Performance in Windows Server 2008 R2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/teamdhcp/archive/2009/06/29/dhcp-server-performance-in-windows-server-2008-r2.aspx#3280325</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:00:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3280325</guid><dc:creator>teamdhcp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have had questions asked of us on the impact of the new link layer filtering (aka MAC address based filtering)on the DHCP server performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on the testing conducted for measuring impact of MAC address based filtering on performance, we have found negligible performance drop with MAC address based filtering configured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With 100,000 MAC addresses configured (50,000 each in allow and deny list), the drop in average response time was to the order of 1-2% across multiple test runs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prasad&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>