<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows 7 Battery Life Needs Manufacturers to Get On-board</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/11/28/windows-7-battery-life-needs-manufacturers-to-get-on-board.aspx</link><description>Techradar has an excellent piece on the engineering efforts around Windows 7 battery life.&amp;#160; Although the headline is definitely sensationalist and inaccurate, the meat of the article is quite good.&amp;#160; An interesting paragraph describes how configuration</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>HaveYouSeenMyStapler.NET - Viral Tarpara&amp;#39;s Blog : Windows 7 &amp;#8230; | kozmom</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/11/28/windows-7-battery-life-needs-manufacturers-to-get-on-board.aspx#3161181</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:37:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3161181</guid><dc:creator>HaveYouSeenMyStapler.NET - Viral Tarpara&amp;#39;s Blog : Windows 7 &amp;#8230; | kozmom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kozmom.com/32739-haveyouseenmystaplernet-viral-tarparas-blog-windows-7.htm"&gt;http://www.kozmom.com/32739-haveyouseenmystaplernet-viral-tarparas-blog-windows-7.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>