<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How To: Fix Outlook Data Corruption</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/05/02/how-to-fix-outlook-data-corruption.aspx</link><description>So I had a weird morning today. My computer woke up from sleep a little grumpy, definitely not the typical experience which is usually smooth as a baby’s bottom. Anyway, I fire up outlook and I’m greeted with an error that says Outlook can’t launch because</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: How To: Fix Outlook Data Corruption</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/05/02/how-to-fix-outlook-data-corruption.aspx#3049023</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:22:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3049023</guid><dc:creator>feetsdr@gmail.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran into this (corrupt OST) recently. &amp;nbsp;We just deleted the OST and reopened outlook (we were already on the domain). &amp;nbsp;The ost file was rebuilt. &amp;nbsp;If you are in the office, is this a valid way to resolve the problem?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: How To: Fix Outlook Data Corruption</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/05/02/how-to-fix-outlook-data-corruption.aspx#3049031</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:29:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3049031</guid><dc:creator>Viral Tarpara</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;this is absolutely valid way to do it, but it takes much longer usually depending on your quota size. &amp;nbsp;I personally had a 450MB account so on top of downloading the data, my machine would have to reindex all the items which can take A LOT more time. &amp;nbsp;As I move into a 2GB account soon, I would want to avoid your method as much as I can.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;just for reference, on my Dell D820 Core 2 Duo laptop, SCANOST took less than 5 minutes. &amp;nbsp;Your method can take up to an hour if not more depending on your quota size and usage. &amp;nbsp;You may be able to start working much sooner, but a stable state won't be reached for sometime.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>