<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Better Way To Defrag</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/04/03/a-better-way-to-defrag.aspx</link><description>What year is it?&amp;#160; It&amp;#8217;s 2008 and I&amp;#8217;m still writing about how to defrag my Windows machine.&amp;#160; It&amp;#8217;s pathetic.&amp;#160; The whole idea is ridiculous especially considering that as the size of partitions have shot up almost exponentially,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: A Better Way To Defrag</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/tarpara/archive/2008/04/03/a-better-way-to-defrag.aspx#3057618</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:54:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3057618</guid><dc:creator>Dyonas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As a thank you, and because I thought you were pretty funny as well as good overall at the TechNet roadshow event in Newcastle, I used your code to get myself a TechNet Plus Direct subscription. &amp;nbsp;If only they were as quick to activate as this defrag program is I'd be happy. &amp;nbsp;Still waiting for it after 3 whole days! &amp;nbsp;Yes, I'm impatient &amp;nbsp;:/&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>