<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>WSUS: Service Packs may be reported as not applicable even though they are installed</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/sus/archive/2008/08/27/wsus-service-packs-may-be-reported-as-not-applicable-even-though-they-are-installed.aspx</link><description>The question about how Service Packs are reported is one that seems to come up all the time, and understandably so because it can be very confusing if you don't understand what's really going on. Fortunately our very own Joe Tindale wrote up a great explanation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>WSUS: Clients reports Service Packss as &amp;#8220;not applicable&amp;#8221; even though they are installed</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/sus/archive/2008/08/27/wsus-service-packs-may-be-reported-as-not-applicable-even-though-they-are-installed.aspx#3112959</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:17:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3112959</guid><dc:creator>WSUS: Clients reports Service Packss as &amp;#8220;not applicable&amp;#8221; even though they are installed</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.ditii.com/2008/08/27/wsus-clients-reports-service-packss-as-not-applicable-even-though-they-are-installed/"&gt;http://www.ditii.com/2008/08/27/wsus-clients-reports-service-packss-as-not-applicable-even-though-they-are-installed/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>