<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Claria Detection in AntiSpyware</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod/archive/2005/07/11/407525.aspx</link><description>Claria has been receiving a lot of news lately, and so I figured I would re-post what is going on over here in regards to this. We put the following statement on our website as well ( http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/claria_letter.mspx</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Claria Detection in AntiSpyware</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod/archive/2005/07/11/407525.aspx#409154</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 03:52:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:409154</guid><dc:creator>Anthrax</dc:creator><description>Yes, i do agree 100%, claria is a headache. the uninstall of such sw is really difficult making it very instrusive and undesired. Whe do should have the control of the sw we want to be install in the machines and when we do not want them any more uninstallation should be for real as well.</description></item></channel></rss>