<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Free workflow engine for MCMS from Skelta</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_gossner/archive/2005/06/09/406120.aspx</link><description>[Via Arpan Shah ] At TechEd Orlando Skelta , announced that they are providing a lite version of their workflow product with seamless integration with MCMS. You will be able to run 25 concurrent workflow processes at any given time - which should be sufficient</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Free workflow engine for MCMS from Skelta</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_gossner/archive/2005/06/09/406120.aspx#406193</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:48:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406193</guid><dc:creator>Stefan_Gossner</dc:creator><description>test</description></item><item><title>re: Free workflow engine for MCMS from Skelta</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_gossner/archive/2005/06/09/406120.aspx#432655</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:42:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:432655</guid><dc:creator>mohindv</dc:creator><description>In Such scenario what is the MS next step, In such scenario is it a win win situation for Skelta becasue MS wont be able to compete taking CMS ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What i feel Partners will stop buying CMS and would consider SPS next as one store ..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is your comments in this scenario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;mohindv</description></item><item><title>re: Free workflow engine for MCMS from Skelta</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_gossner/archive/2005/06/09/406120.aspx#432927</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:58:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:432927</guid><dc:creator>Stefan_Gossner</dc:creator><description>Hi Mohindv,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MCMS and SPS have different functionality. You can't replace MCMS with SPS in all situations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next version of MCMS will be part of MOSS 2007 - together with SPS. So in next version of MCMS the search engine will be included.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Stefan</description></item><item><title>Extending CMS Workflow | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/stefan_gossner/archive/2005/06/09/406120.aspx#3189554</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:19:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3189554</guid><dc:creator>Extending CMS Workflow | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/361848-extending-cms-workflow"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/361848-extending-cms-workflow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>