<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Have you seen the new OpsManJam site?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/smsandmom/archive/2008/08/13/have-you-seen-the-new-opsmanjam-site.aspx</link><description>Some of our folks out in the field got together and put up a fantastic OpsManager website out at http://www.opsmanjam.com and if you haven't seen it already you should definitely check it out.&amp;#160; They're posting unofficial management packs, management</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Have you seen the new OpsManJam site?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/smsandmom/archive/2008/08/13/have-you-seen-the-new-opsmanjam-site.aspx#3105731</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3105731</guid><dc:creator>rodtrent</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Content is starting to flow in, which is good. &amp;nbsp;However, with all the build-up internally for this, I thought it would have been a bit better. &amp;nbsp;Sharepoint is really not the best technology to provide a top resource like this. &amp;nbsp;It's an OpsMan site, so far without the &amp;quot;Jam&amp;quot; part of it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>