Google Sites vs SharePoint - Like Comparing Pencil & Paper to a PC

Good morning everyone! So here I am down in Charlotte, North Carolina getting ready to give a presentation around SharePoint as a development platform and doing some catch up with my email. One email caught my eye and has me bouncing around, so while my blood is pumping I thought I should write this up before I forget. There are a lot of articles out there (sometimes well meaning ones at that) which paint SharePoint in a distorted picture due to the lack of understanding around all that it offers and the flexibility it provides users. To those unfamiliar with its full capability and flexibility in choice reading such pieces can leave a skewed impression that is in fact not reflective of the full platform. With that in mind I decided with an hour to kill I needed to jump on this, so here we go!

Yesterday an interesting article was sent to me that called out what on the surface appears to be a strong challenge presented by Google to Microsoft's SharePoint Platform. The article titled "Google Sites Offers Templates; Claims It's Easier Than Sharepoint" highlights upgrades to the Google Sites platform that it cites as evidence that "Google Sites is making a clear strike against Microsoft which requires a certain level of technical skill to create a Sharepoint site." Citing improvements in page layouts, gadgets, template saving, as well a what is termed a web-centric approach vs document-centric one, the article tries to make the case for Google Sites presenting a challenge to the SharePoint platform while admitting that "Most organizations work in a document centric environment." Overall I found in the article that the author tried to present a balanced view of the two platforms, but if one really takes an in-depth look at what both platforms have to offer it becomes readily apparent that there really is no comparison between the two when looking at the needs of Enterprise customers. With that in mind I would like to point out some of the key differences and ways in which comparing the SharePoint platform to Google Sites is really like comparing a pen and paper to a fresh, fully loaded computer. Sure they both provide a platform for writing notes and ideas but that is where the semblance ends.

With Google Sites the article "Google Sites Offers Templates; Claims It's Easier Than Sharepoint" points out that users can easily assemble pages, add gadgets to pages, save pages as templates and that as web-centric platform its pundits claim that it is superior in providing links to pages vs providing documents. With that in mind lets take a look at how the SharePoint platform also provides the same functionality with superior Enterprise capability while also offering document-centric capability where the business deems appropriate. Then let us also take a look at how SharePoint moves beyond such baseline activity and delivers a rich capability far beyond that and how this really extends the experience with the SharePoint 2010 release.

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is a web based collaboration platform rooted in facilitating collaboration between users based on the predication that they know how to either use Microsoft Office, a web browser, or both, but nothing else. It is true that out of the box SharePoint provides rich, seamless, integration for users of Microsoft Office. Using the tools they are most familiar with Office, users can publish slides to slide libraries, publish blog entries using Microsoft Word, publish and share data focused information with Excel, and more. Now to some Google Sites pundits this is something they point out as a so-called shortcoming. There are those, according to the article, who would say that creating content natively as a web page is better and links to pages is better than accessing documents via a folder structure. Really? Better for who? If users are accustomed to working within a folder file structure, then shouldn't a platform designed to better support these individuals not force them to completely rework how they produce content and interact? That is exactly what SharePoint does and is the reason that it has become the fastest growing product in Microsoft's history.

Beyond that though SharePoint does in fact provide a rich environment for creating native web content that resides as pages and links. Out of the box SharePoint provides an integrated wiki platform where users can create content like FAQs and other entities utilizing wiki markup language and simple rich text editing capabilities. SharePoint also provides a robust blogging platform out of the box (my own blog SocialMedia Talk in fact runs on SharePoint). Web based surveys, threaded discussion boards, calendars, task lists, issues lists, project task lists with Gantt charting are all out of the box. Additionally SharePoint provides a range of web page templates for assembling dashboards of web parts, creating content pages and more, with the ability to create custom ones that are in turn saved as templates. Sound familiar? And all of this is done on a platform that integrates with Enterprise security, provides robust auditing and compliance capabilities and sits atop an Enterprise workflow engine. SharePoint does in fact provide a rich we-centric environment. The difference is in the SharePoint platform business users are given a choice to work and interact with content in the manner that makes most sense for them and their users. SharePoint doesn't try and shove the round peg in a square hole.

SharePoint doesn't stop though with just simple content interaction and production. SharePoint truly is a business enablement platform. Microsoft understands that business users have a need to access and manipulate data as well as content. Through services such as the Business Data Catalog, Excel Services, InfoPath Services, and Performance Point Services SharePoint provides users avenues to leverage their existing skill sets to deliver rich web based content and services. With the Business Data Catalog users can readily place Business Data Web Parts on web pages that expose business critical data from backend systems and they can do so without being a code junkie, but just an everyday Office user. Excel services allow users of Excel to tie rich data and charting capability for dynamic data, publish a spreadsheet to SharePoint, and then provide a <gasp> dynamic, interactive web page that delivers a rich view of that Excel content viewable by a browser. InfoPath leverages the skills of Microsoft Word users to create forms and outputs XML forms that are published to SharePoint, are accessed via a browser as a.. <you guessed it> web page. With the inclusion of Performance Point Server corporations now have high end business intelligence capabilities integrated into SharePoint, delivered via web pages, and made accessible to the masses within an organization. Such application delivery in the past was prohibitively expensive for all but a few corporate users but now is made user friendly and available for everyone. These are areas that Google Sites can't even begin to touch.

But wait Michael, isn't there this little thing called SharePoint 2010 on the horizon? Does it bring anything else to the table? Absolutely!!

With SharePoint/Office 2010 Microsoft is introducing the Office Web applications. These are delivered Windows SharePoint Foundation Server or SharePoint Server.With Office Web Applications users can again use of their familiar tools to create rich content which they can publish to SharePoint. The difference is now when they create Word docs, PowerPoint slide decks, Excel spreadsheets, OneNote books, these same "documents" are viewable as web pages (note they can be viewed through the browser as a web page but are in fact documents published in the Open XML format). Not only that, they are also editable through the web interface as well given end users the freedom of choice in how they want to interact with the content. SharePoint 2010 also delivers integrated digital assets management, enhancements to blogs and wikis, and more, as well as full offline capability for all content, whether web-centric or document-centric, via the new addition to Microsoft Office, SharePoint Workplace. SharePoint is also ramping things up in the insight and composite applications space with Power Pivot, Access Services, Visio Services, Business Connectivity Services, and much more. Finally, if you want to have SharePoint provided for as a SaaS offering that is also available from Microsoft through Microsoft Online Services.

Google is doing some interesting things with its Sites and apps. To try though and compare those capabilities with SharePoint really misses the boat. While fine for casual, simplistic content needs the Sites platform is limited at best. With Microsoft SharePoint though, customers have a true Enterprise enablement set of tools that provide the best of web-centric and document-centric flexibility. There is a reason that SharePoint's growth has been meteoric. It provides the best, most comprehensive and flexible platform for today's business user.

If want you want to learn more about SharePoint, and some of the integrated services mentioned here be sure to check out the following sites:


Technorati Tags: Microsoft,Google,SharePoint,Gannotti,Technology

Published 18 November 09 03:12 by Mike_Gannotti

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Googleverse said on November 26, 2009 3:47 AM:

Google site designed to cater general audience where as SharePoint is made for cooperated and is more professional.

# Aery said on November 26, 2009 3:49 AM:

Absolutely corrects. They cant be compared coz their purpose is different and have different class of users.

Google site designed to cater general audience where as SharePoint is made for cooperated and is more professional.

# J Critchlow said on December 17, 2009 10:30 AM:

Both tools have a place. If someone could bridge the MAC gap and provide more functionality for MAC users, I believe SharePoint would be the best choice for many enterprises, especially Academia.

# Michael Gannotti said on December 19, 2009 5:03 AM:

Hi All,

Michael, the author of the post here. You make some great points in that they are definitely both aimed at different audiences primarily today with SharePoint being squarely focused on Enterprise users and Enterprise requirements and the Google stack being much more directed to the casual web user. I do think though that the upcoming year will be an interesting one. With the release of SharePoint 2010 I believe you will see more web based service offerings based off of SharePoint that that are squarely directed at the casual web user. Conversely, I believe that you will see Google striving to up its offerings to become more Enterprise ready so inevitably there will be be increasing overlap and head to head competition. In the end the consumer, whether casual web user or Enterprise client, will be the winner as the increased competition will only spur both sides to continue to improve and innovate in their offerings. Scintillating title aside though I do agree that today, for the moment, the two are like comparing apples and oranges. Both my be web entities (fruit) but after that the focus and intent begins to diverge according to their respective core audiences.

Michael Gannotti

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

  
Enter Code Here: Required

Search

This Blog

Syndication

Page view tracker