<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exposed? : Examining Secunia Unpatched Warnings - Part 2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/01/17/exposed-examining-secunia-unpatched-warnings-part-2.aspx</link><description>This is Part 2 of my look at the perceptions and realities concerning disclosed, but unpatched vulnerability trends between Windows and Linux. You may want to read Part 1 first. UPDATE: Oh, and Part 3 with results will be posting on Friday. I followed</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Exposed? : Examining Secunia Unpatched Warnings - Part 3</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/01/17/exposed-examining-secunia-unpatched-warnings-part-2.aspx#602375</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:41:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:602375</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Jones Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the final post in my 3 part series trying to get an accurate view of disclosed, but unpatched&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Exposure exposed!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/01/17/exposed-examining-secunia-unpatched-warnings-part-2.aspx#602799</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:49:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:602799</guid><dc:creator>Robert Hensing's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who has ever debated the whole &amp;quot;Microsoft vs. Linux security&amp;quot; thing needs to read this series&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>