<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Where, oh Where, are Perfect Security Features?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx</link><description>In my recent exploration of Windows Vista x64 security features and Patchguard (see pt1 and pt2 ), one of the issues sent my thoughts in the direction of how "perfect" security feature are (or are not) and how that affected security value to customers.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Where, oh Where, are Perfect Security Features?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx#455433</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:37:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:455433</guid><dc:creator>Alun Jones</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Silver bullets are for werewolves - vampires need wooden steaks&amp;quot; :-)&lt;br&gt;Note that even when you come up with a really good security feature, say Patchguard, someone else, say an antivirus vendor, cries foul because they want to be able to inject code into every device driver on your system, as well as the kernel.&lt;br&gt;As users and administrators, we're faced with the dilemma that many malware actions are actually also reasonable user actions.&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Delete this document&amp;quot; - 'No, you might be a virus'&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Update this field with a different number&amp;quot; - 'No, you might be a virus'&lt;br&gt;Pretty soon, you end up with OS and data carved in stone, never to change - not so useful.&lt;br&gt;Obviously, there's some measure to which you can spot malware that says &amp;quot;delete this document, but do it in such a way that the user doesn't figure out that you're doing it&amp;quot;, and that's where much of the skill lies.</description></item><item><title>Real Life Protection! IE7 on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx#459442</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:05:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:459442</guid><dc:creator>Think Security - Jeff Jones Security Blog </dc:creator><description>Happy&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;day, if you get this dialog&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;box:&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;This&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;screenshot comes from Zdnet article&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;Vista...</description></item><item><title>Real Life Protection! IE7 on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx#506861</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:28:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:506861</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Jones Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy day, if you get this dialog box: This screenshot comes from Zdnet article Vista passes one security&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>UAC, an Excellent Description and Discussion by Crispin Cowan</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx#3054257</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:08:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3054257</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Jones Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was excited when Dr. Crispin Cowan joined the company a while back - what security person wouldn't&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>UAC, an Excellent Description and Discussion by Crispin Cowan | IT &amp;amp; Network Security Blog</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx#3087963</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 22:04:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3087963</guid><dc:creator>UAC, an Excellent Description and Discussion by Crispin Cowan | IT &amp;amp; Network Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ntoolz.net/blog/2008/07/12/windows-security/uac-an-excellent-description-and-discussion-by-crispin-cowan/"&gt;http://ntoolz.net/blog/2008/07/12/windows-security/uac-an-excellent-description-and-discussion-by-crispin-cowan/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>UAC, an Excellent Description and Discussion by Crispin Cowan | IT &amp;amp; Network Security Blog</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/24/449938.aspx#3088182</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:05:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3088182</guid><dc:creator>UAC, an Excellent Description and Discussion by Crispin Cowan | IT &amp;amp; Network Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ntoolz.net/blog/2008/07/13/windows-security/uac-an-excellent-description-and-discussion-by-crispin-cowan/"&gt;http://ntoolz.net/blog/2008/07/13/windows-security/uac-an-excellent-description-and-discussion-by-crispin-cowan/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>