<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows vs Linux (Red Hat) - Server - 1st Half 2006</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx</link><description>NOTE: I am not asserting that my vulnerability analysis demonstrates that Windows is more secure. Rather, I frequently hear and read Linux advocates making unsupported assertions to the opposite that Linux is inherently more secure than Windows. The "unsupported"</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Jeff Jones on 1H-06 Server Vuln Comparison</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#441427</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:32:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:441427</guid><dc:creator>Harald Leitenmüller's WebLog</dc:creator><description>Jeff Jones recently posted on his security blog a great article about H1&amp;amp;amp;ndash;06 server vulnerabilities....</description></item><item><title>Vulnerabilite : analyse comparative Windows 2003 / Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4 (Advanced Server) &amp;raquo;  Wagalulu - Security  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Vulnerabilite : analyse comparative Windows 2003 / Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#441578</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:39:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:441578</guid><dc:creator>Vulnerabilite : analyse comparative Windows 2003 / Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4 (Advanced Server) »  Wagalulu - Security  » Blog Archive   » Vulnerabilite : analyse comparative Windows 2003 / Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4 (Advanced Server)</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://security.wagalulu.com/2006/07/13/vulnerabilite-analyse-comparative-windows-2003-redhat-enterprise-linux-3-and-4-advanced-server/"&gt;http://security.wagalulu.com/2006/07/13/vulnerabilite-analyse-comparative-windows-2003-redhat-enterprise-linux-3-and-4-advanced-server/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Jeff Jones' 1H 2006 Windows &amp;amp;amp; RedHat Security Vulnerabilities analysis </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#441654</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:34:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:441654</guid><dc:creator>Notes2Self.net</dc:creator><description>Jeff's posted two charts and a couple of tables that compare how the server products did vulnerability-wide...</description></item><item><title>Windows vs. Linux Server Security</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#441719</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:23:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:441719</guid><dc:creator>It's Way Too Early For This</dc:creator><description>Jeff Jones has completed an initial vulnerability comparison between Windows Server 2003 (WS2003) and...</description></item><item><title>Apples, Oranges and Vulnerability Metrics</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#441878</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:441878</guid><dc:creator>Think Security - Jeff Jones Security Blog </dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NOTE:&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; I am not asserting that my vulnerability analysis demonstrates that Windows is more...</description></item><item><title>Jeff Jones' 1H 2006 Windows &amp;amp;amp; RedHat Security Vulnerabilities analysis </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#453620</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:17:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:453620</guid><dc:creator>Notes2Self.net</dc:creator><description>Jeff's posted two charts and a couple of tables that compare how the server products did vulnerability-wise</description></item><item><title>Common Objections - Comparing Linux Distros with Windows</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/07/13/441386.aspx#613648</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:32:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:613648</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Jones Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again, my effort to explore common misperceptions (more recently exploring unpatched statistics&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>