<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Passes 1000 Vulnerabilities</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities.aspx</link><description>A few weeks after my July OS Vulnerability Scorecard posting, I was amused to see a posting about it on truthhhappens.redhatmagazine.com (click to see the post). I can't even do it justice by paraphrasing, so here is the text: A Microsoft vulnerability</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>totalnetsolutions.net &amp;raquo; Microsoft VS. Red Hat - Why did they go there?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities.aspx#2185179</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2185179</guid><dc:creator>totalnetsolutions.net » Microsoft VS. Red Hat - Why did they go there?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.totalnetsolutions.net/2007/10/16/microsoft-vs-red-hat-why-did-they-go-there/"&gt;http://www.totalnetsolutions.net/2007/10/16/microsoft-vs-red-hat-why-did-they-go-there/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Redhat fixes their 1,000th CVE</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities.aspx#2198682</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:58:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2198682</guid><dc:creator>Robert Hensing's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We now have several years worth of solid CVE / vuln data that has accrued (both for us and our competitors)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Tsk, tsk...Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Passes 1000 Vulnerabilities</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities.aspx#2199300</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:53:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2199300</guid><dc:creator>Rod Trent at myITforum.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Tsk, tsk...Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Passes 1000 Vulnerabilities</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities.aspx#2199746</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2199746</guid><dc:creator>MVPs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Passes 1000 Vulnerabilities</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/10/16/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-passes-1000-vulnerabilities.aspx#2229533</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:36:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2229533</guid><dc:creator>rodney.buike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that is some creative marketing going on at Red Hat :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>