<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx</link><description>Summer and work travel have really had an impact and I've missed a couple of months of scorecards, so last weekend, I decided to dig in and catch up to July. I hit a few road bumps: Sun changed their Security Alerts web site, making it a bit more challenging.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>
			University Update
			-
			Firefox
			-
			July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard
		</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1767902</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:49:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1767902</guid><dc:creator>
			University Update
			-
			Firefox
			-
			July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard
		</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.universityupdate.com/Technology/Firefox/4597649.aspx"&gt;http://www.universityupdate.com/Technology/Firefox/4597649.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Vista Still Strong In Vulnerability Scorecards</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1768171</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:18:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1768171</guid><dc:creator>Josh's Windows Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft security blogger Jeff Jones has an updated vulnerability scorecard out that is designed to&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Grafico de Vulnerabilidades año a año</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1770004</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:44:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1770004</guid><dc:creator>Windows Vista</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;* RHEL Desktop 5 shipped in March, so only represents vulns since then Ya no resulta extra&amp;#241;o ver Sistemas&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Trumps other OS's in Vulnerability Scorecard </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1770763</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:39:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1770763</guid><dc:creator>Nanda Lella's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Vista is by far more secure than any other OS's and same is the case with Windows Server 2003&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1782048</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:13:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1782048</guid><dc:creator>The Security Wizard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;like every other month, Jeff Jones publishes in his blog the operating system vulnerability scorecard&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Umstieg auf Vista</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1795167</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:23:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1795167</guid><dc:creator>datenhafen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Verdammt!!!1!!1eins!!elf. Wie ich gerade auf heise.de lesen muss, ist Vista weiterhin sicherer als andere Betriebssysteme. Das hat nun Jeff Jones, seines Zeichens &amp;quot;Strategy Director in the Microsoft Security Technology Unit&amp;quot;, in seinem Blog aufgezeigt.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1798263</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:32:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1798263</guid><dc:creator>dotmatt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps I'm simply missing it somewhere on your site here, but could you post your original tabular data? &amp;nbsp;I'd like to see exactly which vulnerabilities were compared, and (because I am an untrusting paranoid schitzo) reproduce your charts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Matt&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1801003</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:39:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1801003</guid><dc:creator>secfr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, where are the usn-numbers, the package-names and so on?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can only see a few colourful graphs, not more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1802114</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:36:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1802114</guid><dc:creator>markjcox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The mappings of vulnerabilities affecting Red Hat products to NVD &amp;quot;High&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Medium&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Low&amp;quot; have significant data errors which significantly affect the results of your studies; &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.press.redhat.com/2007/06/27/third-party-severity-ratings/"&gt;http://www.press.redhat.com/2007/06/27/third-party-severity-ratings/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Security Week in Review (2007-08-19)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1838381</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:53:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1838381</guid><dc:creator>Josh's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;July 2007 Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard I ran across this vulnerability report. The goal of which appears to be to show that Windows Server 2003 has fixed significantly fewer flaws than various other operating systems. Upon reading the rep&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Como manipular informações em benefício próprio</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1840058</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:44:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1840058</guid><dc:creator>Oneda</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Quando voc&amp;#234; acha que j&amp;#225; viu de tudo nesse mundo, sempre aparece algo para surpreender! A Red Hat, famosa&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#1840529</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:27:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1840529</guid><dc:creator>Alexan_der</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;From this report I can see only one thing: Microsoft does NEVER fix medium and low valued problems. It's clean - if you made a critical bugs, you will also make a low-valued, isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's not a very honest politic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be, you'll create also graphs of &amp;quot;not fixed&amp;quot; bugs?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3161175</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:27:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3161175</guid><dc:creator>Estetik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;like every other month, Jeff Jones publishes in his blog the operating system vulnerability scorecard&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3171120</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:08:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3171120</guid><dc:creator>oto müzik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;like every other month, Jeff Jones publishes in his blog the operating system vulnerability scorecard&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3199249</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:09:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3199249</guid><dc:creator>balon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;where are the usn-numbers, the package-names and so on?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3208342</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:44:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3208342</guid><dc:creator>Hosting</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps I'm simply missing it somewhere on your site here, but could you post your original tabular data? &amp;nbsp;I'd like to see exactly which vulnerabilities were compared, and (because I am an untrusting paranoid schitzo) reproduce your charts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeahh thankss&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3209180</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:28:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3209180</guid><dc:creator>Cinsel Sorunlar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;where are the usn-numbers, the package-names and so on?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3213125</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:23:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3213125</guid><dc:creator>cinsel sohbet</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;where are the usn-numbers, the package-names and so on?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: July 2007 - Operating System Vulnerability Scorecard</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/08/16/july-2007-operating-system-vulnerability-scorecard.aspx#3230313</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:26:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3230313</guid><dc:creator>burun estetigi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;where are the usn-numbers, the package-names and so on?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>