<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Vista - 6-Month Vulnerability Study</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/30/windows-vista-6-month-vulnerability-study.aspx</link><description>I was nudged by some colleagues this week, telling me that some folks may only be reading my technet blog, but that I hadn't been doing a great job of cross-posting some things. Six months is a much more interesting time frame than the previous Windows</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Untitled Document</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/30/windows-vista-6-month-vulnerability-study.aspx#2777181</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:17:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2777181</guid><dc:creator>Untitled Document</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://geekinparadise.com/2008/01/24/vista-1-year-vulnerability-report/"&gt;http://geekinparadise.com/2008/01/24/vista-1-year-vulnerability-report/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>