<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>2006 Client OS Days of Risk</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/18/2006-client-os-days-of-risk.aspx</link><description>As a follow-up to my previous Days-of-risk in 2006 : Linux, Mac OS X, Solaris and Windows , where I compare Microsoft, Red Hat, Novell SUSE, Apple Mac OS X and Sun Solaris, I've also completed a look at the latest client products that were available for</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>FilipeFreitas.net &amp;raquo; Operating Systems security comparison</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/18/2006-client-os-days-of-risk.aspx#1329428</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:30:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1329428</guid><dc:creator>FilipeFreitas.net » Operating Systems security comparison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://filipefreitas.net/blog/?p=31"&gt;http://filipefreitas.net/blog/?p=31&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>