<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>2006 Days of Risk Comparison</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/15/2006-days-of-risk-comparison.aspx</link><description>Among the other metrics that I track, I also periodically look at days-of-risk, or the average amount of time that customers are exposed to public vulnerabilities before a vendor provides a patch. You can take a look at the full findings on Days-of-risk</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: 2006 Days of Risk Comparison</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/15/2006-days-of-risk-comparison.aspx#1252810</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:40:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1252810</guid><dc:creator>KomatoZo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good figures. Even if we keep in mind that MS vulnerabilities are usually more severe than those on Linux.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: 2006 Days of Risk Comparison</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2007/06/15/2006-days-of-risk-comparison.aspx#1256916</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:20:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1256916</guid><dc:creator>kizzer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is you're Windows Vista 180 Day Vuln Analysis available yet?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>