<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SBS - Upgrades and Migration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/sbsuk/archive/2008/07/02/sbs-upgrades-and-migration.aspx</link><description>I was inspired by a partner who emailed me this week and said, 'The more bluntly you say &amp;quot;There is no upgrade, either new, or swing migration&amp;quot; the simpler and better'. So whilst David , Nicholas King and many others have been trying to get the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: SBS - Upgrades and Migration</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/sbsuk/archive/2008/07/02/sbs-upgrades-and-migration.aspx#3083107</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:46:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3083107</guid><dc:creator>vriyait</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sonal,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we'll have to wait and see on the Swing Migration side (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.sbsmigration.com"&gt;http://www.sbsmigration.com&lt;/a&gt;) because I believe Jeff Middleton is working on a process for SBS 2008. It's true there is nothing publicly available yet for SBS 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you bought a new server within the last 12-18 months then chances are that it's 64 bit capable. So, if the customer wants SBS 2008 then they might want to keep the same hardware. Swing is great because it means the clients machines don't know anything has changed and the process can largely be accomplished offsite meaning less downtime for the customer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vijay&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>