<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Network Performance factors and numbers for RRAS</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rrasblog/archive/2006/06/26/network-performance-factors-and-numbers-for-rras.aspx</link><description>This has been a constant source of customer worries - will RRAS performance meet my needs ? How will RRAS compare against other hardware appliances? Please don't think me as a sales person promoting RRAS after you read this blog:). I am an engineer and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Interesting Finds: June 26, 2005 AM edition</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rrasblog/archive/2006/06/26/network-performance-factors-and-numbers-for-rras.aspx#438873</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:19:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:438873</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Not stable vpn connection on sbs 2003 | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rrasblog/archive/2006/06/26/network-performance-factors-and-numbers-for-rras.aspx#3185323</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:44:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3185323</guid><dc:creator>Not stable vpn connection on sbs 2003 | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/4218733-not-stable-vpn-connection-on"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/4218733-not-stable-vpn-connection-on&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>