<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why I'm not running Chrome anymore (back to IE8 beta 2 for me)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/robert_hensing/archive/2008/09/05/why-i-m-not-running-chrome-anymore-back-to-ie8-beta-2-for-me.aspx</link><description>http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/6367 Long strings leading to stack overruns? Really Google? Srsly? I guess I have the answer to my questions about whether they have an SDL / or the notion of banned APIs / or automated code scanning stuff . . . I mean</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Why I'm not running Chrome anymore (back to IE8 beta 2 for me)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/robert_hensing/archive/2008/09/05/why-i-m-not-running-chrome-anymore-back-to-ie8-beta-2-for-me.aspx#3123538</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:06:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3123538</guid><dc:creator>ts8</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;FYI: Gynvael has posted a correction. Apparently the function hooking is a compatibility mechanism, not a security mechanism. &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://gynvael.coldwind.pl/?id=57"&gt;http://gynvael.coldwind.pl/?id=57&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>