<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The latest SQL Injection Attacks</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2008/05/30/the-latest-sql-injection-attacks.aspx</link><description>Well, there was quite some chatter over the last few weeks with regards to the massive defacements we saw based on SQL Injection Attacks. So, what was really new? Close to nothing. Well, this is not completely true. The new thing we have seen with these</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>SQL Injection – again?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2008/05/30/the-latest-sql-injection-attacks.aspx#3172139</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:04:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3172139</guid><dc:creator>Roger's Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This week I had – again – a longer mail thread on SQL Injection attacks. Probably it caught me at the&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>