<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is Security Research Ethical?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2008/05/22/is-security-research-ethical.aspx</link><description>Shoaib's blog actually pointed me to a pretty interesting article called Face-Off: Is vulnerability research ethical? - Security Experts Bruce Schneier &amp;amp; Marcus Ranum Offer Their Opposing Points of View . Not surprisingly Bruce says "yes" and Marcus</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Why Apple has to fix the Safari flaw</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2008/05/22/is-security-research-ethical.aspx#3063302</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3063302</guid><dc:creator>Roger's Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember me talking about Is Security Research Ethical? I made a statement in there when it comes to&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>