<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US"><title type="html">Roger's Security Blog</title><subtitle type="html">As Chief Security Advisor of Microsoft EMEA - lets share interesting security information</subtitle><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/atom.xml</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/atom.xml" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="2.1.61025.2">Community Server</generator><updated>2009-09-29T18:20:03Z</updated><entry><title>International Collaboration on Policies for Cybersecurity and Data Protection</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/11/05/international-collaboration-on-policies-for-cybersecurity-and-data-protection.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/11/05/international-collaboration-on-policies-for-cybersecurity-and-data-protection.aspx</id><published>2009-11-05T20:41:43Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T20:41:43Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Since a few years we are working with the Council of Europe in a partnership to help to drive a Cybersecurity treaty. We realize that a problem a lot of Law Enforcement agencies have is inconsistent legislation which makes is unbelievably hard to catch the criminals. The Council of Europe treaty is a great starting point and has been ratified not only by most of the member states of the Council of Europe but by a lot of additional countries around the globe.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Now, the European Union and the United States have agreed to treat such challenges as international issues and to develop joint policies based on shared values. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the agreement is not too concrete but the fact that we have an agreement in place, should let us hope: &lt;a href="http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.21271%21menu/standard/file/EU-US%20Joint%20Statement%2028%20October%202009.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;EU-US Joint Statement on &amp;quot;Enhancing transatlantic cooperation in the area of Justice, Freedom and Security&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="wlWriterHeaderFooter" style="text-align:right; margin:0px; padding:4px 0px 4px 0px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f11%2f05%2finternational-collaboration-on-policies-for-cybersecurity-and-data-protection.aspx&amp;amp;title=International+Collaboration+on+Policies+for+Cybersecurity+and+Data+Protection"&gt;&lt;img src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width="100" height="20" alt="Digg This" title="Digg This" border="0" style="border: 0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3291803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Cybercrime" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Cybercrime/default.aspx" /><category term="Policy" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Policy/default.aspx" /><category term="Processes" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Processes/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Power of Knowledge: Security Intelligence Report v7</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/11/02/power-of-knowledge-security-intelligence-report-v7.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/11/02/power-of-knowledge-security-intelligence-report-v7.aspx</id><published>2009-11-02T16:06:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-02T16:06:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;It is a good tradition since quite a while that we make the intelligence we have available accessible to the broad public. This will help out customers to protect themselves much better. The Security Intelligence Report (SIR) is built on a unparalleled set of sensors out there in the Internet:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT)&lt;/strong&gt;: runs on 450 million computers worldwide each month. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BING&lt;/strong&gt;: performs billions of Web-page scans per year. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows Live OneCare and Windows Defender&lt;/strong&gt;: on 100 million + computers worldwide. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Forefront Online Protection for Exchange&lt;/strong&gt;: scanning billions of emails yearly. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows Live Hotmail&lt;/strong&gt;: 30 + countries - hundreds of millions of active e-mail users. &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;As there is nobody in the industry who is able to match this, we are convinced that it is of outmost importance that we share our intelligence with the broad industry.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Looking at the report itself, there are a few key findings this time:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rogue Security Software&lt;/strong&gt; is sill one of the biggest threats for our customers. Even though we found less rogue software on computers (13.4 million computers compared to 16.8 million in H208) it is still a significant threat to the ecosystem. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Worms are back&lt;/strong&gt;: Worms rose from the fifth place to the number 2 with a 98.4% increase. This is largely due to Conficker and Tatef. &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;To visualize the second point, let’s look at the computers cleaned by threat category:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/photos/rhalbheer_gallery/images/3290842/original.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin-left: auto; border-left-width: 0px; margin-right: auto" title="500x298[1]" border="0" alt="500x298[1]" src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/PowerofKnowledgeSecurityIntelligenceRepo_F05C/500x298%5B1%5D_3.png" width="500" height="298" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This is a pretty significant spike.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;There are a few diagrams I usually like to look at as well. One is the geographical distribution in order to understand my region. So, let’s look at the malware infections globally:    &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/photos/rhalbheer_gallery/images/3290846/original.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin-left: auto; border-left-width: 0px; margin-right: auto" title="500x301[1]" border="0" alt="500x301[1]" src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/PowerofKnowledgeSecurityIntelligenceRepo_F05C/500x301%5B1%5D_1.png" width="500" height="301" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;So, you see there is quite some room for improvement.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Now, to close this very, very short summary of the report, it is definitely worth looking at two additional graphs. One is the malware distribution per Operating System:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/photos/rhalbheer_gallery/images/3290847/original.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin-left: auto; border-left-width: 0px; margin-right: auto" title="500x320[1]" border="0" alt="500x320[1]" src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/PowerofKnowledgeSecurityIntelligenceRepo_F05C/500x320%5B1%5D_1.png" width="500" height="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; This supports a statement I make so often: If I would have one wish to our customers, it would be: “Always stay on the latest version of all the software you have” – not from a business perspective but from a security view. And the second wish would be, cover all your software, when you do patch management. Remember my post called &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/03/26/patch-management-cover-the-whole-9-yards.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Patch Management – Cover the whole 9 yards&lt;/a&gt;? I told you that you should take care of the whole software stack – not “just” Microsoft. And the reason for that is the following diagram:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/photos/rhalbheer_gallery/images/3290848/original.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px" title="500x291[1]" border="0" alt="500x291[1]" src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/PowerofKnowledgeSecurityIntelligenceRepo_F05C/500x291%5B1%5D_1.png" width="500" height="291" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; As you can easily see, our share in the overall vulnerability landscape is very, very small. So, we need a joint effort across the whole industry to write secure software from the bottom up with processes like the Security Development Lifecycle! And guess what – your problem will not become easier to solve when you move to the cloud.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Now, if you want to read the report, here are the important links:   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/Threat/SIR.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Security Intelligence Report landing page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=037f3771-330e-4457-a52c-5b085dc0a4cd&amp;amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank"&gt;download page for the report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;And the &lt;a href="http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9693459" target="_blank"&gt;video with Ken and Vinny&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Have fun&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="wlWriterHeaderFooter" style="text-align:right; margin:0px; padding:4px 0px 4px 0px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f11%2f02%2fpower-of-knowledge-security-intelligence-report-v7.aspx&amp;amp;title=Power+of+Knowledge%3a+Security+Intelligence+Report+v7"&gt;&lt;img src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width="100" height="20" alt="Digg This" title="Digg This" border="0" style="border: 0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3290851" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Security Compliance Management Toolkit Series for IE 8 and Windows 7</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/30/security-compliance-management-toolkit-series-for-ie-8-and-windows-7.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/30/security-compliance-management-toolkit-series-for-ie-8-and-windows-7.aspx</id><published>2009-10-30T16:09:53Z</published><updated>2009-10-30T16:09:53Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Just a brief one: the Security Compliance Management Toolkit Series has been updated to incorporate Internet Explorer 8 and Windows 7. So, to help you to manage security and compliance in your environment, you should have a look at it: &lt;a title="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/cc835245.aspx" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/cc835245.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/cc835245.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="wlWriterHeaderFooter" style="text-align:right; margin:0px; padding:4px 0px 4px 0px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f30%2fsecurity-compliance-management-toolkit-series-for-ie-8-and-windows-7.aspx&amp;amp;title=Security+Compliance+Management+Toolkit+Series+for+IE+8+and+Windows+7"&gt;&lt;img src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width="100" height="20" alt="Digg This" title="Digg This" border="0" style="border: 0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3290419" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft Products" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft+Products/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx" /><category term="Processes" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Processes/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Look at the Enhanced Mitigation Evaluation Toolkit</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/29/look-at-the-enhanced-mitigation-evaluation-toolkit.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/29/look-at-the-enhanced-mitigation-evaluation-toolkit.aspx</id><published>2009-10-29T12:26:56Z</published><updated>2009-10-29T12:26:56Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Recently we announced the availability of the Enhanced Mitigation Evaluation Toolkit. This is a toolkit which makes it easier to defend your application on different levels – free of charge. Read the post done by our Security Research and Defense guys: &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2009/10/27/announcing-the-release-of-the-enhanced-mitigation-evaluation-toolkit.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Announcing the release of the Enhanced Mitigation Evaluation Toolkit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="wlWriterHeaderFooter" style="text-align:right; margin:0px; padding:4px 0px 4px 0px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f29%2flook-at-the-enhanced-mitigation-evaluation-toolkit.aspx&amp;amp;title=Look+at+the+Enhanced+Mitigation+Evaluation+Toolkit"&gt;&lt;img src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width="100" height="20" alt="Digg This" title="Digg This" border="0" style="border: 0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3290042" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx" /><category term="Processes" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Processes/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Secure Datacenter, Secure Cloud, Secure Government</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/28/secure-datacenter-secure-cloud-secure-government.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/28/secure-datacenter-secure-cloud-secure-government.aspx</id><published>2009-10-28T07:06:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-28T07:06:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;At the moment I invest a lot of my time in a Whitepaper on Client and Cloud Security. There are a few fundamentals, which are already clear to me:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You will not be able to run a trusted cloud ecosystem without a trusted client and trusted interactions. So, the End to End Trust model is needed in the cloud as well.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;A strong, federated identity metasystem is at the base of any cloud security&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Process transparency as an absolute need if you move to the cloud. If the provider tells you “you should not care about that, we take care of your security” – walk away from the deal.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This morning I read a blog post by Theresa Carlson. She is a Vice President in the Public Sector at Microsoft Us and blogged about &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/uspublicsector/archive/2009/10/14/secure-the-datacenter-secure-the-cloud.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/uspublicsector/archive/2009/10/14/secure-the-datacenter-secure-the-cloud.aspx"&gt;Secure the Datacenter, Secure the Cloud&lt;/A&gt;. She raises the issue of process transparency as well and it is a post which is definitely worth readying.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roger&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: right; PADDING-BOTTOM: 4px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 4px" class=wlWriterHeaderFooter&gt;&lt;A href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f28%2fsecure-datacenter-secure-cloud-secure-government.aspx&amp;amp;title=Secure+Datacenter%2c+Secure+Cloud%2c+Secure+Government" mce_href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f28%2fsecure-datacenter-secure-cloud-secure-government.aspx&amp;amp;title=Secure+Datacenter%2c+Secure+Cloud%2c+Secure+Government"&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px" title="Digg This" border=0 alt="Digg This" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width=100 height=20 mce_src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3289721" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Microsoft Products" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft+Products/default.aspx" /><category term="Cloud Computing" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Cloud+Computing/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Pandemic Planning (Dilbert)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/26/pandemic-planning-dilbert.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/26/pandemic-planning-dilbert.aspx</id><published>2009-10-26T16:44:46Z</published><updated>2009-10-26T16:44:46Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Get ready for the swineflu:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Dilbert.com" href="http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-10-24/"&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Dilbert.com" src="http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/70000/1000/200/71293/71293.strip.gif" width="500" height="155" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="wlWriterHeaderFooter" style="text-align:right; margin:0px; padding:4px 0px 4px 0px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f26%2fpandemic-planning-dilbert.aspx&amp;amp;title=Pandemic+Planning+(Dilbert)"&gt;&lt;img src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width="100" height="20" alt="Digg This" title="Digg This" border="0" style="border: 0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3289235" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Fun" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Fun/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Could Microsoft solve the scareware problem?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/22/could-microsoft-solve-the-scareware-problem.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/22/could-microsoft-solve-the-scareware-problem.aspx</id><published>2009-10-22T06:55:33Z</published><updated>2009-10-22T06:55:33Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This morning I read the following article: &lt;a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/158689,commentary-microsoft-can-help-kill-fake-antivirus-threat.aspx"&gt;Microsoft can help kill fake antivirus threat&lt;/a&gt;. And interesting approach. The proposal is that we could white-list all the legitimate security software within the OS in order to make it harder to trick the user. Well, would this work? I am not so sure:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;First of all, what is Security Software and how do you find out? All the the security vendors can play by the rules and make sure it is detectable. But sacreware (fake anti-malware software) will probably not – or will for sure not. So, what is the difference between any legitimate application, any application which interacts with the desktop and presents a GUI vs. scareware? Scareware just show scary windows and makes you install their software – which is typically malware. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;The base technology is in Windows but it would have to be applied to security software only. &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;What is legitimate security software? There are obvious ones like Symantec’s, McAfee’s, TrendMicros’, F-Secure’s, Microsoft's solutions. That’s easy. But I am sure (just an experience from the past) that there will be a pretty big gray zone which makes it very hard to decide and who decides then – us? &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;Last but not least, let’s talk about the regulators. Do they (and does the market) really want us to take this decision and “certify” anti-malware solutions? This would come with a price – and reading the comments in the article below, this is one of the issues. &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;To me, the problem is wider spread than “just” fake anti-malware solutions. I understand that this is a problem – definitely and I understand that the thoughts of white-listing security software is attractive. But the problem is malware in general and how the criminals trick the user into installing something they do not want. This leads back to the question of the trusted stack which we address in our &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/endtoendtrust"&gt;End to End Trust&lt;/a&gt; vision. To me, that’s the only approach which can be successful&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="wlWriterHeaderFooter" style="text-align:right; margin:0px; padding:4px 0px 4px 0px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f22%2fcould-microsoft-solve-the-scareware-problem.aspx&amp;amp;title=Could+Microsoft+solve+the+scareware+problem%3f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width="100" height="20" alt="Digg This" title="Digg This" border="0" style="border: 0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3288349" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Why it pays to be secure – Chapter 3 – But how do I?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/18/why-it-pays-to-be-secure-chapter-3-but-how-do-i.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/18/why-it-pays-to-be-secure-chapter-3-but-how-do-i.aspx</id><published>2009-10-18T18:20:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-18T18:20:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Our EMEA Security Program Manager, Henk van Roest, started this series internally and with his consent I am publishing it here in my blog as I think it contains a lot of great information for you to use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Security — you hear about it every day. Being responsible for information security can be a daunting task, so where do you begin? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the design of acceptable use policies to preventing insiders from stealing data, the job can be a challenging one. Join Senior Security Strategist with the Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Group Kai Axford, as he explores each layer of Defense in Depth during this eight-part webcast series. Kai shows you how mitigate the new risks in security and may have you rethinking the methods you’re using. He also spends time talking about your hot topics of the day. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Specifically there is an 8 part series as detailed below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4371" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4371"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 1 of 8): Why Does Security Matter? (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 7, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the first session of the series, we discuss risk and the impact of security on the business. We look at some popular methods to assess risk and identify the need for an overall security strategy. We also explore why you should care about information security, how to measure the success of your program, and how to prove it to your boss using the concept of Return on Security Investment (ROSI). Learn how security impacts the cash flow of your business. &lt;STRONG&gt;Bring your CFO to this one!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4372" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4372"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 2 of 8): All Bark and No Bite (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 8, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our second session, we take a look at what is considered to be the most important aspect of information security: security policies. We discuss the policies that exist within your company and how to strengthen them. After all, what good is a policy if it is not enforceable? We also investigate the most cost-effective way for you to increase the security posture of your business. What is it? You have to tune in to see! You will not be disappointed. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4373" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4373"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 3 of 8): Gates, Guards, and Guns (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 9, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today we look at an aspect of information security that is often overlooked by technical folks. It is the physical security aspect of our job. Are you aware that every year at DEFCON there is a lock picking contest? In this session, we dive into various techniques and methods that we should be considering when it comes to providing physical security around our datacenters. We discuss some of the recent trends in this area, such as IP video surveillance, and also discuss resources that can assist you in coming up with a good overall physical security plan. (No locks were harmed in preparation of this session.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4374" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4374"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 4 of 8): Living on the Edge (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 10, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In case you are not aware, the Internet is not a safe and happy place. Have you thought about all the other branch offices and partners you are connected too? Bad things are going on and you would like to do what you can to keep them out in the wild. In today's session, we look at some of those risks, and also discuss some technologies you should be considering when looking at securing the perimeter. You know about Intrusion Protection Systems (IPS), Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), and firewalls, but are they doing any good? Is the DMZ as we know it today…dead? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4375" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4375"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 5 of 8): Keeping Your House in Order (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 14, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We start the week by discussing a problem that is close to your heart: your network. But how can we even begin to take on that challenge? What are some of the things on the horizon that we need to be aware of? In this session, we look at technologies and concepts such as IP Security (IPSec) Domain Isolation and Network Access Protection (NAP). We also look into some practical things that you should be doing right now to protect one of your most valuable assets.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4376" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4376"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 6 of 8): Save the Box, Save the Network (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 15, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Servers. We all love them. Wouldn't it be so much easier if we simply did away with everything else? There is no argument that the multitude of desktops, laptops, and mobile devices has created headaches for the IT security professional. Just when you lock down a desktop, the sales guy gets a new laptop, and then a new mobile phone. We cannot (legally) eliminate the users, but join us to see what we can do to stay ahead of the risks! &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4377" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4377"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 7 of 8): If You Build It (Securely), They Won't Come (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 16, 2008 &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Grab the caffeine and pizza! Today we step into the dark underground of AppDev and discuss methods for securing applications that run inside your infrastructure. As we harden the network and hosts, the bad guys are looking for other ways in, and often it is the applications being written by your own developers. Do your developers have the time and tools required to build their applications securely, or is security merely an afterthought? What tools are available to assist them? We show you today. No coding required. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4378" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/securityexperts.aspx?tab=Webcasts&amp;amp;seriesid=109&amp;amp;webcastid=4378"&gt;TechNet Webcast: 2008 Defense in Depth Security Series (Part 8 of 8): If a Terabyte Falls in the Middle of the (Active Directory) Forest (Level 200)&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;Original Air Date: &lt;/B&gt;January 17, 2008&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Got data? Sure you do, but how much? Where is it? How is it protected? What is it worth to you? Which is the most important? If you could save only one database, which would it be? Answers to all these burning questions, as well as some closing thoughts from Kai, are going to be covered in this final session. You do not want to miss this electrifying and intense final webcast!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR&gt;
Henk and Roger 
&lt;DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; PADDING-BOTTOM: 4px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 4px" class=wlWriterHeaderFooter&gt;&lt;A href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f18%2fwhy-it-pays-to-be-secure-chapter-3-but-how-do-i.aspx&amp;amp;title=Why+it+pays+to+be+secure+%e2%80%93+Chapter+3+%e2%80%93+But+how+do+I%3f" mce_href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.technet.com%2frhalbheer%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f18%2fwhy-it-pays-to-be-secure-chapter-3-but-how-do-i.aspx&amp;amp;title=Why+it+pays+to+be+secure+%e2%80%93+Chapter+3+%e2%80%93+But+how+do+I%3f"&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px" title="Digg This" border=0 alt="Digg This" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png" width=100 height=20 mce_src="http://digg.com/img/badges/100x20-digg-button.png"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3287536" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Policy" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Policy/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx" /><category term="Processes" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Processes/default.aspx" /><category term="Events/Training" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Events_2F00_Training/default.aspx" /><category term="Technology" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx" /><category term="Behaviour" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Behaviour/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>COFEE now distributed via a NW3C as well</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/16/cofee-now-distributed-via-a-nw3c-as-well.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/16/cofee-now-distributed-via-a-nw3c-as-well.aspx</id><published>2009-10-16T09:15:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-16T09:15:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;COFEE is a tool available to Law Enforcement only to capture online evidence with a little training as possible. The idea behind the tool is, that there is little need for high-trained staff to be available during e.g. house searches and that a normal, much less trained officer can capture all the data. Until today, Interpol was the only channel for distribution. Now, &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/oct09/10-13COFEEPR.mspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/oct09/10-13COFEEPR.mspx"&gt;the US National White Collar Crime Center is the second organization being able to distribute it&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are a Law Enforcement Agency/Officer and want access to the tool, you may contact Interpol or NW3C&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roger&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3287248" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Cybercrime" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Cybercrime/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft Products" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft+Products/default.aspx" /><category term="Law Enforcement" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Law+Enforcement/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Software Piracy – A Threat to Security!</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/14/software-piracy-a-threat-to-security.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/14/software-piracy-a-threat-to-security.aspx</id><published>2009-10-14T12:08:57Z</published><updated>2009-10-14T12:08:57Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Beginning of this year, I tried to understand, whether we can show a collaboration between Piracy (stolen software) and Malware Infections. I played a little bit with the data I had available and came to the conclusion, that there most probably is: &lt;a href="http://www.halbheer.info/security/archive/2009/01/20/is-there-a-correlation-between-stolen-software-piracy-and-securitypatching.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Is there a Correlation between Stolen Software (Piracy) and Security/Patching?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Now, the &lt;a href="http://www.bsa.org" target="_blank"&gt;Business Software Alliance&lt;/a&gt; recently published &lt;a href="http://global.bsa.org/globalpiracy2008/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;their annual report for 2008 with regards to pirated software&lt;/a&gt; again. So, this is the summary of the study:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;2008 was another year of mixed progress in the fight against PC software piracy. The good news is that the rate of PC software piracy dropped in 57 (52 percent) of the 110 countries studied and remained stable in another 39 countries (35 percent).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The bad news is that despite the drop in piracy in many countries, the global PC software piracy rate went up. This was the mathematical outcome of rapid growth of PC markets in high-piracy countries. emerging markets saw PC shipments grow 33 percent faster than mature markets. Even if piracy were to go down in every high-piracy country, their growing market share for PCs will continue to drive the global average up until piracy is cut more deeply.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;What really shocks me is when I look at the “best” countries. United States is the best with 20% (!) stolen software. I am living in Switzerland and here (place 6) there is a 25% piracy rate. So, think about that. In one of the wealthiest country, 1/4 of the software is stolen. This is like you get only paid for 6 hours a day if you work 8 (at best!).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;We can now debate about Open Source and free software. I am still convinced that personally I want to get paid for my intellectual property and that protection of IP is the foundation of any growth or recovery. However, I did not want to elaborate on this.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In addition to this interesting report, the &lt;a href="http://www.bsa.org" target="_blank"&gt;Business Software Alliance&lt;/a&gt; published another one called: &lt;a href="http://www.bsa.org/internetreport" target="_blank"&gt;Software Piracy on the Internet: A Threat To Your Security&lt;/a&gt;. The conclusion of this report is that &lt;em&gt;Individuals who, mistakenly or otherwise, turn to auction sites and peer-to-peer networks to acquire or transfer illegal software expose themselves to everything from malware and identity theft to criminal prosecution&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Worth reading it!&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3286790" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>SharePoint External Collaboration Toolkit moved to Codeplex</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/14/sharepoint-external-collaboration-toolkit-moved-to-codeplex.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/14/sharepoint-external-collaboration-toolkit-moved-to-codeplex.aspx</id><published>2009-10-14T11:20:59Z</published><updated>2009-10-14T11:20:59Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Quite a while ago I blogged about the SharePoint External Collaboration Toolkit. I just wanted to make you aware that this toolkit is now moved to Codeplex and can be found here: &lt;a title="http://cks.codeplex.com/" href="http://cks.codeplex.com/"&gt;http://cks.codeplex.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3286762" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Microsoft Products" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft+Products/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx" /><category term="OpenSource" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/OpenSource/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Africa Cable – A Chance for Africa! – A Threat for the Internet?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/07/the-africa-cable-a-chance-for-africa-a-threat-for-the-internet.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/07/the-africa-cable-a-chance-for-africa-a-threat-for-the-internet.aspx</id><published>2009-10-07T17:10:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-07T17:10:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;The development in Africa especially with the new broadband services to me is a huge chance for the whole continent. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I just found this map on the next two years:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG style="BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: block; FLOAT: none; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: auto; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: auto" title=3764474517_78d7b452a3[1] border=0 alt=3764474517_78d7b452a3[1] src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/TheAfricaCableAChanceforAfricaAThreatfor_E347/3764474517_78d7b452a3%5B1%5D_60e29930-d7d9-4434-a03a-575ba09ed3d0.jpg" width=500 height=473 mce_src="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/TheAfricaCableAChanceforAfricaAThreatfor_E347/3764474517_78d7b452a3%5B1%5D_60e29930-d7d9-4434-a03a-575ba09ed3d0.jpg"&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P align=center&gt;source: IntelFusion&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even though I have not been in Africa over the last few months, I heard that in different cities fiber is brought directly to the household, which brings technology and opportunities I would love to see here in Western Europe, where we still have to rely on copper. So, if the governments in Africa are serious with this, I think this is an outstanding growth opportunities for those markets. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the other hand, when I talk to customers and governments in Western Europe, there is a lot of dis-trust as well. Can we trust the governments? How much malware will be spread coming from this continent? Actually, the kick for this post was the following article just outlining this: &lt;A href="http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2009/10/africa-home-of-worlds-largest-cyber.html" mce_href="http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2009/10/africa-home-of-worlds-largest-cyber.html"&gt;Africa - home of the world’s largest cyber pandemic&lt;/A&gt; – which makes me think.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I look at our &lt;A href="http://www.halbheer.info/security/archive/2009/04/08/security-intelligence-report-scareware-on-the-raise.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.halbheer.info/security/archive/2009/04/08/security-intelligence-report-scareware-on-the-raise.aspx"&gt;Security Intelligence Report&lt;/A&gt; back in April (the new one will be coming soon) and look at the malware infection rate we see, it is not worse nor better than any other region:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG style="WIDTH: 600px; HEIGHT: 344px" src="http://www.halbheer.info/security/Media/WindowsLiveWriter/TheAfricaCableAChanceforAfricaAThreatfor_E347/Infection%20Rate%20-%20World%20(600x344)[1]_2.jpg" width=600 height=344 mce_src="http://www.halbheer.info/security/Media/WindowsLiveWriter/TheAfricaCableAChanceforAfricaAThreatfor_E347/Infection%20Rate%20-%20World%20(600x344)[1]_2.jpg"&gt;&lt;A href="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/TheAfricaCableAChanceforAfricaAThreatfor_E347/Infection%20Rate%20-%20World%20(600x344)%5B1%5D_2.jpg" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.technet.com/blogfiles/rhalbheer/WindowsLiveWriter/TheAfricaCableAChanceforAfricaAThreatfor_E347/Infection%20Rate%20-%20World%20(600x344)%5B1%5D_2.jpg"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, the data we have available from Africa might not be as broad as in other regions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another thing came to my mind. I was in &lt;A href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2007/12/08/a-retrospect-on-my-trip-to-kenya.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2007/12/08/a-retrospect-on-my-trip-to-kenya.aspx"&gt;Kenya two years ago on a business trip&lt;/A&gt; and I learned one thing – the idea of shipping outdated PCs to Africa to help people there does not work as it requires them to run old and outdated software which makes them open for attacks. Simple, isn’t it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looking at my figures, it is a problem but not smaller or bigger than any other region on this globe. Additionally, one of the reasons, why our teams work so hard to get &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/default.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/default.aspx"&gt;Microsoft Security Essentials&lt;/A&gt; out of the door for all countries is just to reduce this threat. Make a professional Anti-Malware solution available to people who cannot afford one free of charge. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rather than being threatened, let’s welcome this continent on the “broadband Internet” and help them now to learn from our challenges and failures in the past.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roger&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3285281" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Cybercrime" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Cybercrime/default.aspx" /><category term="Behaviour" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Behaviour/default.aspx" /><category term="Consumer" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Consumer/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>What’s the “Cloud” or better “What’s not a Cloud”</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/02/what-s-the-cloud-or-better-what-s-not-a-cloud.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/10/02/what-s-the-cloud-or-better-what-s-not-a-cloud.aspx</id><published>2009-10-02T07:45:45Z</published><updated>2009-10-02T07:45:45Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;On analyst (and very active Tweeter on &lt;a title="http://twitter.com/monkchips" href="http://twitter.com/monkchips"&gt;http://twitter.com/monkchips&lt;/a&gt;) quite a while ago (March 08) published a post, which we recently drew up in one of the cloud discussions:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you peel back the label and its says “Grid” or “&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.globus.org/ogsa/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;OGSA&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;” underneath… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you need to send a 40 page requirements document to the vendor then… it is not cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you can’t buy it on your personal credit card… it is not a cloud&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If they are trying to sell you hardware… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there is no API… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you need to rearchitect your systems for it… Its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If it takes more than ten minutes to provision… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you can’t deprovision in less than ten minutes… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you know where the machines are… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If there is a consultant in the room… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you need to specify the number of machines you want upfront… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If it only runs one operating system… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you can’t connect to it from your own machine… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you need to install software to use it… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you own all the hardware… its not a cloud.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;If it takes 20 slides to explain…. its not a cloud [update: 4:58 4th February 2009]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I just love it (the post is on &lt;a title="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/03/13/15-ways-to-tell-its-not-cloud-computing/" href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/03/13/15-ways-to-tell-its-not-cloud-computing/"&gt;http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/03/13/15-ways-to-tell-its-not-cloud-computing/&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3284502" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Cloud Computing" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Cloud+Computing/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Thoughts on the Registered Traveler Programs at Airports</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/09/30/thoughts-on-the-registered-traveler-programs-at-airports.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/09/30/thoughts-on-the-registered-traveler-programs-at-airports.aspx</id><published>2009-09-30T19:03:56Z</published><updated>2009-09-30T19:03:56Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;When I entered the US this time, I got a brochure on how I could avoid the line at immigration and just get a fast track by registering with the &lt;a href="http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/trusted_traveler/global_entry/" target="_blank"&gt;Global Entry Program&lt;/a&gt;, a program, which would pre-screen me and then I just have to register with a machine by entering the US. As I understand, this is a re-start of the &lt;a href="http://www.flyclear.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Clear&lt;/a&gt; program TSA had a few years back. I looked at it and as waiting time in the lines in Seattle (where I enter the US in 95% of the cases) is shorter than the waiting time for the luggage, there is no real benefit for me opposed to the privacy and security questions (yes, I am paranoid).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This morning then, I read an interesting blog post by Bill Nagel, a Forrester analyst, called &lt;a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/srm/2009/09/its-the-database-stupid.html" target="_blank"&gt;It’s The Database, Stupid&lt;/a&gt;, covering some of the worries linked to those programs. It is a really good – not emotional – read.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3284097" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Behaviour" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Behaviour/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Microsoft Security Essentials – Ready to download</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/09/29/microsoft-security-essentials-ready-to-download.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/2009/09/29/microsoft-security-essentials-ready-to-download.aspx</id><published>2009-09-29T19:20:03Z</published><updated>2009-09-29T19:20:03Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Why pay for a Anti-Malware solution if you can get one of the best solutions in the world for free – go and download it! It is there: &lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/" href="http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;And now, the disclaimer: It runs only on genuine Windows!&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Have fun, enjoy. I am running it since quite a while with my friends and families and they all love it as they do not see and feel it at all – unless something bad happens. It is great!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3283849" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>rhalbh</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/rhalbh.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Microsoft Products" scheme="http://blogs.technet.com/rhalbheer/archive/tags/Microsoft+Products/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>