http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/08/15/changes-between-scvmm-2008-beta-and-the-final-release.aspxAside from overall performance, stability and reliability (things you might expect to improve from any beta), I thought I'd give folks a heads up on some of the things that we've added/changed for the final release next month which weren't in the beta.en-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/08/15/changes-between-scvmm-2008-beta-and-the-final-release.aspx#3106913Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:57:48 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3106913James O'Neill's blog <p>Not surprisingly I get a lot of questions about future versions of products. Typically I get things like</p> http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/08/15/changes-between-scvmm-2008-beta-and-the-final-release.aspx#3110164Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:13:28 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3110164Jaap's blog<p>Om Hyper-V servers te managen kan VMM 2008 gebruikt worden, dit is echter nog steeds in beta fase. Voor</p> http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/08/15/changes-between-scvmm-2008-beta-and-the-final-release.aspx#3111732Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:40:36 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3111732leonowski@earthlink.net<p>Will credssp authentication from a Windows XP SP3 client work now with the self service portal?</p> http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/08/15/changes-between-scvmm-2008-beta-and-the-final-release.aspx#3136357Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:13:07 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3136357ateece<p>What about support of Virtual Server on Windows 2008?</p> <p>This is a supported configuration of Virtual Server, and we would like to run our non-Hyper-V capable servers as Windows 2008 Core with Virtual Server 2008.</p> <p>We are currently testing this on 1 server but were unable to manage it with the SCVMM 2008 beta. SCVMM not supporting a supported configuration of Virtual Server seems odd given the support for third parties. Shouldn't MS support MS fully first?</p>