<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VMware Management and SCVMM - Why does SCVMM require Virtual Center in order to integrate?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/07/28/vmware-and-scvmm-why-do-we-require-virtual-center.aspx</link><description>A popular question that seems to be floating on various blogs and message boards is related to why SCVMM integrates with Virtual Infrastructure by proxying requests through Virtual Center Web Service APIs as opposed to talking directly to ESX. There are</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>rakeshm&amp;#8217;s VM Management Blog : VMware Management and SCVMM - Why does SCVMM require Virtual Center in order to integrate? | System Center Guide</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/07/28/vmware-and-scvmm-why-do-we-require-virtual-center.aspx#3095481</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:33:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3095481</guid><dc:creator>rakeshm&amp;#8217;s VM Management Blog : VMware Management and SCVMM - Why does SCVMM require Virtual Center in order to integrate? | System Center Guide</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://systemcenterguide.com/2008/07/29/rakeshms-vm-management-blog-vmware-management-and-scvmm-why-does-scvmm-require-virtual-center-in-order-to-integrate/"&gt;http://systemcenterguide.com/2008/07/29/rakeshms-vm-management-blog-vmware-management-and-scvmm-why-does-scvmm-require-virtual-center-in-order-to-integrate/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SCVMM 2008 and VMware management - we must be doing something right...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/07/28/vmware-and-scvmm-why-do-we-require-virtual-center.aspx#3211069</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:24:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3211069</guid><dc:creator>rakeshm's VM Management Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It has come to my attention that some of our competitors are making various claims about SCVMM 2008 and&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SCVMM and VMware ESX management</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/rakeshm/archive/2008/07/28/vmware-and-scvmm-why-do-we-require-virtual-center.aspx#3211102</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:48:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3211102</guid><dc:creator>Windows Virtualization Team Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The threat of virtualization sprawl. That was a theme my colleagues heard last week at IDC's &amp;quot;Directions&amp;quot; conference in San Jose. And true to IDC's form, they backed up their predictions with some numbers. Here's an excerpt from one article: Virtualization&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>