<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Guidance on page file size X64 and X32 machines Windows 2003 servers </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/perfguru/archive/2008/09/24/guidance-on-page-file-size-x64-and-x32-machines-windows-2003-servers.aspx</link><description>There seems to be a little confusion on the page file sizing on X64 machines and X32 machines as well. Lots of kb articles have been written; am trying to simplify it in this post. On 32 bit machines it is easier to determine the size of the paging file</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title> &amp;raquo; Considera????es sobre o tamanho do pagefile no Windows 2003 de 32 e 64bits</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/perfguru/archive/2008/09/24/guidance-on-page-file-size-x64-and-x32-machines-windows-2003-servers.aspx#3127833</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:20:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3127833</guid><dc:creator> &amp;raquo; Considera????es sobre o tamanho do pagefile no Windows 2003 de 32 e 64bits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.rustice.com.br/2008/09/24/consideracoes-sobre-o-tamanho-do-pagefile-no-windows-2003-de-32-e-64bits/"&gt;http://blog.rustice.com.br/2008/09/24/consideracoes-sobre-o-tamanho-do-pagefile-no-windows-2003-de-32-e-64bits/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Guidance on page file size X64 and X32 machines Windows 2003 servers </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/perfguru/archive/2008/09/24/guidance-on-page-file-size-x64-and-x32-machines-windows-2003-servers.aspx#3130174</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:41:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3130174</guid><dc:creator>pawansharma</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sri,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PF Usage in Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 is actually the system commit total. This number represents potential page file usage, not actual page file usage. It is how much page file space would be used if all the private committed virtual memory in the system had to be paged out all at once.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;System Perfmonace depends on many factors eg Memory, Processor ,Disk and load on server etc. I would say, performance monitor will be your friend here to check the system performance and bottle neck (If any).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To check physical memory usage you can use the following counters in performance monitor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memory\ Available Bytes &amp;nbsp; -&amp;gt; This counter could help you in find the available memory .If this value is less constantly then you need to update RAM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below two counters are for virtual memory usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memory\ Pool NonPaged Bytes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memory\ Pool Paged Bytes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this will help you to understand how to proceed :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pawan&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Paginación y máquinas virtuales</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/perfguru/archive/2008/09/24/guidance-on-page-file-size-x64-and-x32-machines-windows-2003-servers.aspx#3197202</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:37:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3197202</guid><dc:creator>Microsoft, su tecnología y yo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hola Realmente el post anterior era para poder poner este. En una m&amp;amp;#225;quina virtual, &amp;amp;#191;c&amp;amp;#243;mo&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>