<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DNS Client Resolver Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/06/26/dns-client-resolver-behavior.aspx</link><description>The following question comes up from time to time and for various reasons. What is the expected name resolution behavior of the DNS client resolver on Windows XP or Windows Vista? This may be for a single or for multiple network interfaces. So I thought</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: DNS Client Resolver Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/06/26/dns-client-resolver-behavior.aspx#3259153</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:28:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259153</guid><dc:creator>Richard R</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for putting this together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Resolver Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/06/26/dns-client-resolver-behavior.aspx#3259193</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:42:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259193</guid><dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So there is only one question LEFT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How is the interface selection done? Wich interface will be the first and the second, third,... one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And how does this work if you have dynamic interfaces like VPN Adapters or Virtual Adapters?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a change in this process with Win7 &amp;nbsp;and W2008R2?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Resolver Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/06/26/dns-client-resolver-behavior.aspx#3259320</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:19:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259320</guid><dc:creator>Richard Hicks</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you comment on the DNS resolver behavior changes in Windows Vista with regard to the handling of responses that include IP addresses that appear to be unreachable from the local host?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/"&gt;http://tmgblog.richardhicks.com/2009/01/10/dns-resolver-behavior-in-windows-vista/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Resolver Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/06/26/dns-client-resolver-behavior.aspx#3259711</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:54:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259711</guid><dc:creator>Mkline</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Really good information Clark, I haevn't seen this documented this well anywhere else. &amp;nbsp;This one is getting put into the favorites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Resolver Behavior</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/06/26/dns-client-resolver-behavior.aspx#3276738</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:33:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3276738</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; So there is only one question LEFT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; How is the interface selection done? Wich interface&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; will be the first and the second, third,... one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any answers here? &amp;nbsp;Windows 7 and Vista seem to prefer a VPN/PPP connection, but Windows XP would prefer ethernet/wireless connections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'd really like to get back the previous behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>