<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx</link><description>In Windows, the DNS Client service is the client component that resolves and caches Domain Name System (DNS) domain names. When the DNS Client service receives a request to resolve a DNS name that it does not contain in its cache, it queries an assigned</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Sixth SenseS  &amp;raquo; Microsoft Enterprise Networking Team : DNS Client Name Resolution &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3227331</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:57:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3227331</guid><dc:creator>Sixth SenseS  &amp;raquo; Microsoft Enterprise Networking Team : DNS Client Name Resolution &amp;#8230;</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://sixthsenses.net/?p=744"&gt;http://sixthsenses.net/?p=744&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3227342</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:21:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3227342</guid><dc:creator>domain finder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;this is very helpful most especially to first timers. im starting to make my own website and it's good that i read this article.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3227680</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:53:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3227680</guid><dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That's an interesting tidbit, but can anyone put this in context and explain the reason for the change between XP and Vista?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3237805</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:55:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3237805</guid><dc:creator>Michael Schell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I imagine it's to speed up negative name resolution by discarding queries that are very unlikely to produce a positive response (appending the search list to a name that's already multi-label).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3257269</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:44:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3257269</guid><dc:creator>stefanbuffalo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I put the registry entry with DWORD=0 into Win XP Pro, however it seems that the DNS suffix search list is still being traversed to append DNS suffixes. Do you have any futher info to turn this off?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thnx.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3271665</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:18:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3271665</guid><dc:creator>Sneh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Stefan: Please try rebooting the XP machine and see if that helps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also how are you checking that the XP machine is appending the suffix list?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please do not use nslookup as a test.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3272308</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:51:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3272308</guid><dc:creator>güvenlik sistemleri</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;windows xp explained what I did something very nice thank you&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: DNS Client Name Resolution behavior in Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/networking/archive/2009/04/16/dns-client-name-resolution-behavior-in-windows-vista-vs-windows-xp.aspx#3292636</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:04:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3292636</guid><dc:creator>mikemillerfl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With windows server 2008 and Windows 7, does DHCP now have the ability to push dns suffix search lists instead of using GPO's? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>