<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Time for your NAP (follow-up /corrections)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/nap/archive/2007/03/16/time-for-your-nap-follow-up-corrections.aspx</link><description>I wanted to follow-up on Adam's great post from last week on NAP's roll-out here within Microsoft. He stated: That actually seemed like a low number to me, and MSIT assures me that it's a reporting error, so I'll update that figure when I get a corrected</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>The Short NAP: Tuesday 20 March 2007</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/nap/archive/2007/03/16/time-for-your-nap-follow-up-corrections.aspx#700892</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:40:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:700892</guid><dc:creator>travelling without moving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been speedlinking some interesting Network Access Protection links in the past (which you can find&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>