<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Terminological consistency and partial language attrition?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/microsoftterminologyforum/archive/2008/01/30/terminological-consistency-and-partial-language-attrition.aspx</link><description>I am wondering what effects our attempts to ensure terminological consistency will have on our languages going forward. Consistent terminology is necessary for efficient localization in a world that values business expansion in a global market while operating</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator></channel></rss>