<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtual PC vs. Virtual Server whitepaper now available for download</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/megand/archive/2005/05/25/405351.aspx</link><description>This whitepaper is now available on Microsoft.com at http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/4/d/14d17804-1659-435d-bc11-657a6da308c0/VSvsVPC.doc . Thanks to those of you who gave me comments on the draft. Abstract: Microsoft® Virtual PC 2004 is a virtual</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Virtual Server 2005 comparison with Virtual PC 2004 - difinitive statement</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/megand/archive/2005/05/25/405351.aspx#405382</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:405382</guid><dc:creator>John Howard</dc:creator><description>Now this is worth a read having just found about it internally. Megans whitepaper which I blogged about...</description></item></channel></rss>